With the cost of gasoline at or near $2.50 a gallon, shoppers are paying added attention to new vehicles' EPA fuel-economy ratings. For many motorists it's become an economic necessity. Choosing a model that gets an average of 25 mpg instead of one that nets only 15 mpg can save an astute buyer as much as $1,000 per year, assuming 15,000 miles driven at $2.50 per gallon of gasoline.

Related Articles

Getting Better Fuel Economy Fuel-Economy Champs Dropping the Fossil-Fuel Habit The Midwest's Black Gold

Manufacturers are required by law to post their vehicles' fuel-economy ratings, as certified by the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), on the window stickers of most every new vehicle sold in the U.S.--the exception would be vehicles having gross-vehicle-weight ratings over 8,500 pounds, heavy-duty pickups and big SUVs for example. As most of us can attest, these "official" ratings rarely reflect our own real-world driving experience. Depending on what, how, and where you drive, the differences can be pronounced.

Recent studies have shown that consumers have begun to place a greater emphasis on fuel economy in the vehicles they are buying.The automotive editors at Consumer Guide® have noted some striking differences between posted EPA ratings and test-fleet fuel-economy averages. According to Mark Bilek, editorial director at Consumer Guide®Automotive, "The EPA's numbers are generally much higher than the fuel economy recorded in the Consumer Guide® test fleet.

One example noted was a six-month evaluation of a 2004 Honda Civic Hybrid with automatic transmission. "During that time Consumer Guide's® automotive editors drove the vehicle 12,000 miles and averaged 38.3 mpg. The EPA fuel-economy numbers posted for an '04 Civic Hybrid are 48 mpg city and 47 mpg highway," Bilek noted.

This example echoes a complaint heard from many consumers: The EPA numbers are substantially higher than what an average owner might expect to experience in real-world driving. One explanation of this might be the way the EPA determines the fuel-economy ratings for each vehicle.

The EPA's testing facility is located in Ann Arbor, Michigan.How New Vehicles Are Tested
Why do the EPA's numbers almost always seem to be off base? It has a lot to do with the way new cars and trucks are evaluated for their energy consumption. While it would seem logical to determine a vehicle's fuel economy by simply filling up the tank, driving it on the road or a test track for a set number of city or highway miles, refilling the tank, and dividing the number of miles driven by the number of gallons consumed, this is not how the experts do it.

In fact, tested vehicles don't reach the pavement at all. Rather, a car or truck's fuel economy is measured under rigidly controlled circumstances in a laboratory using a standardized test that's mandated by federal law. Automakers actually do their own testing and submit the results to the EPA, which reviews the data and confirms about 10 to 15 percent of the ratings itself at the National Vehicles and Fuel Emissions Laboratory.

Vehicles that the EPA tests are tied down and their drive wheels turn the large wheels of a dynamometer, which simulate driving conditions.Each model is tested on what's called a dynamometer, which is like a treadmill for cars. While the engine and transmission drive the wheels, the vehicle never actually moves--just the rollers upon which the wheels are placed. A professional driver runs the vehicle through two standardized driving schedules, one each to simulate city and highway motoring, and ensures he or she is maintaining the mandated pace via a real-time computer display.

The "city" program is designed to replicate an urban rush-hour driving experience in which the vehicle is started with the engine cold and is driven in stop-and-go traffic with frequent idling. The car or truck is driven for 11 miles and makes 23 stops over the course of 31 minutes, with an average speed of 20 mph and a top speed of 56 mph. The "highway" program, on the other hand, is created to emulate rural and interstate freeway driving with a warmed-up engine, making no stops (both of which ensure maximum fuel economy). The vehicle is driven for 10 miles over a period of 12.5 minutes with an average speed of 48 mph and a top speed of 60 mph. Both tests are performed with the vehicle's air conditioning and other accessories are turned off.

A Chevrolet Silverado's theoretical fuel economy is evaluated in the EPA's labs.Throughout the test a hose is connected to the vehicle's tailpipe and collects the engine's exhaust. It's the amount of carbon that's present in what's spewed from the exhaust system that's measured to calculate the amount of fuel burned. The EPA claims this is more accurate than using a fuel-gauge to physically measure the amount of gasoline that's being burned. Still, the final test figures are adjusted downward, by 10 percent for city driving and 22 percent in highway mileage, to help reflect the differences between what happens in a lab and out on an actual road.

How Much Does that Hybrid Get?
As has been well-publicized, the gap between official and experienced fuel economy can be even wider for owners of gas/electric hybrid-powered vehicles. Most experts feel the EPA's ratings for hybrid vehicles tend to be overstated by a factor of at least 20 percent. This discrepancy can be wider yet if a motorist drives primarily on the highway, where hybrids tend to be less efficient than in stop-and-go city driving conditions (during which the electric motor shoulders more of the effort).

The EPA evaluates all sorts of vehicles. In this case a fuel-cell vehicle is tested.Ironically, the results of ongoing operating tests conducted by the EPA of a dozen hybrid cars in its own fleet significantly contradict their posted fuel-economy ratings. According to a report we found on a government website, the best the EPA's fleet could muster was a cumulative average of 37.7 mpg for the Civic, 45.7 mpg for the Insight, and 44.8 mpg for the current-generation Prius. While this is certainly admirable fuel economy, it's still far below the cars' EPA ratings that run as high as 51, 66, and 60 mpg, respectively, for the model years tested.

Why do such discrepancies tend to be more pronounced for hybrids? Experts say it's because basing fuel economy upon the amount of tailpipe exhaust automatically favors gas/electric-powered vehicles. Since some of a hybrid's power comes from an electric motor that automatically produces zero emissions, these figures tend to skew higher than simple miles-driven/gallons-consumed computations would otherwise indicate.

EPA fuel-economy testing is done in a lab rather than on public roads. This helps reduce environmental factors that might influence test results.Discrepancies Beyond the Lab
In addition to the testing methods used to determine the EPA's ratings, a host of other   physical and personal factors contribute to the differences between a vehicle's rated and realized energy consumption. For starters, cars and trucks used for evaluation in the EPA's tests are broken in and are in top mechanical shape. New vehicles don't usually attain their top mileage until they're driven about 3,000 to 5,000 miles, and ill-maintained vehicles will consume more gas than those that are in perfect condition. Even relatively minor upkeep factors as having incorrect air pressure in the tires can affect your vehicle's fuel economy. Depending on where you live, the particular blend of gasoline sold in your area at a given time of the year may have more or less energy content, which in turn results in better or worse fuel economy. What's more, the EPA claims that even small differences in manufacturing and assembling can cause minor disparities in fuel economy from one otherwise alike model to another.

Also, the cars and trucks subjected to fuel economy testing are "driven" without a full complement of passengers, cargo, and options aboard--all else being equal, the heavier a vehicle is, the more fuel an engine will need to burn in order to reach and maintain a set speed. Similarly, the vehicles are tested without the air conditioning and other electrical accessories in use, which also tends to put a greater load on the engine, and thus impacts the vehicle's fuel economy.

2005 Vehicle	EPA City/Hwy	CG® Observed
Acura RSX Type-S, man.	23/31	21.3
Audi A4 2.0 T, man.	22/31	22.5
BMW 325Ci conv., auto.	19/27	21.9
Chevy Cobalt LS sedan, auto.	24/32	28.6
Chevy Colorado LS crew cab, auto.	18/23	17.6
Chrysler 300 Touring w/AWD, auto.	17/24	19.7
Dodge Ram SRT-10, man.	9/15	9.2
Ford Five Hundred SEL AWD, cvt	20/27	18.3
Ford Mustang Premium, auto	19/25	20.4
Honda Accord EX V6 coupe, man.	20/30	23.2
Honda Civic EX coupe, man.	32.37	28.3
Honda Odyssey Touring, auto.	20/28	16.4
Jaguar S-Type 3.0, auto.	18/26	19.4
MINI Cooper conv., man.	28/36	27.6
Saab 9-2X Aero, man.	20/26	20.1
Toyota Highlander Base AWD, auto.	21/25	19.2
Volkswagen Touareg V8, auto.	14/18	12.2
Volvo XC90 V8 AWD, auto.	16/20	15.0

Other physical factors like trip length, traffic conditions, terrain, temperature, and the weather all affect your mileage. Likewise, installing exterior accessories like roof racks and cargo carriers that hamper a vehicle's aerodynamics will take their toll at the pump--the more aerodynamic "drag" that's placed on a vehicle, the more energy it takes to run it, especially at highway speeds. Lead-footed acceleration, heavy braking, high-speed driving, excessive idling, towing, and engaging four-wheel drive will also drain your vehicle's gas tank at a higher-than-average rate. The EPA estimates that jack-rabbit starts and sudden stops alone reduces a car or truck's fuel economy by as much as 33 percent at highway speeds and five percent in the city.

An Imperfect, Yet Useful System
While the EPA's fuel-economy estimates may not be a completely accurate prediction of the kind of mileage you'll register during your daily commute, it's still valid as a source of comparison when you shop for a new vehicle. In addition to city and highway mileage estimates, a new vehicle's price sticker will show the fuel-economy range most drivers can expect to actually achieve with that particular model, the annual estimated fuel cost (based on 15,000 miles per year and a predetermined, though not mentioned, cost per gallon of gas), and the fuel-economy range for other models in its size class. The EPA's estimates for all vehicles can be found in a master list posted at www.fueleconomy.gov, and a printed version can be ordered via the website as well.

At the least, by checking this list you can get a relative idea of how one particular car or truck measures up against others in its class, or how one type of vehicle fares, on average, in comparison with others. If, for example, you're comparing two vehicles and one is estimated to get a third better fuel economy than another, you can reasonably expect to pay a third more to keep the latter's gas tank filled, all else being equal. This is also valid for noting the relative efficiency among available engines in a given car or truck's model range.

A section of the window sticker of every new vehicle is devoted to EPA fuel economy ratings. Consumers should use these numbers to compare vehicles rather than assume they will get similar fuel mileage.With demand for fossil fuel continuing to grow worldwide, and pump taxes remaining an increasingly popular source for state and local revenue, it's not likely that the cost of a gallon of gasoline will fall below the $2.00 mark any time soon, if ever. Some industry observers predict it might rise to as high as $3.00 or more a gallon in the coming years. Thus it behooves your pocketbook to heed the EPA's ratings, however suspect they might be, when shopping for a new vehicle to help you find a model in your size, type, and price range that will deliver the best possible fuel econom