2010 Ford Mustang: Road Test

FUEL ECONOMY

In Consumer Guide testing, a V6 convertible with automatic transmission averaged 20.0 mpg. Manual-transmission GT models averaged 18.0-20.4 mpg. Both V6 and GT use regular-grade gas. The Shelby GT500 requires premium.

STEERING/HANDLING/BRAKING

Base models are competent but not really sporty, with moderate body lean in fast turns and steering that's slightly vague. GTs have nicely weighted steering, impressive dry-road grip, and modest lean that builds progressively with cornering speed. Bumpy turns demand more attention, as they can upset stability more than in rival sporty cars.

CONTROLS

The main gauges are inset into chrome trim rings; they're large and clearly marked, but can be partially obscured by the driver's hands on the steering wheel. Manual shifting is awkward when the console cupholders are in use. With either transmission, the shifter interferes with the low-mounted climate controls. Still, most buttons are large and easy to reach, with most all functions self evident.

ROOM/COMFORT/DRIVER SEATING (FRONT)

Good headroom and legroom, but the cabin feels a bit cozy due to low seats, a high dashtop, and tall windowsills. The seats are comfortable with a nicely contoured backrest, though knees collide easily with hard door panels and the center console. Shoulder belts don't adjust for height. Outward vision is OK in coupes, but poor to the rear corners in the convertible with the top up. Long doors complicate tight-quarters entry and exit.

CARGO ROOM

Coupe cargo space is good for the class. Trunk lids open wide on non-intruding hinges, but the size and shape of the opening makes loading even moderately sized cargo a challenge. Convertibles can accommodate a weekend's worth of soft luggage for two. Cabin storage is sparse, with the door map pockets being almost useless. A lockable console bin is a nice touch.

Total Score