Our road test for the 2006-2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the
2006-2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo and highlighted the vehicle's performance
with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation
2006-2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
In most respects, performance of the Monte Carlo is similar to that of an Impala with the same powertrain. Regardless of engine, Monte Carlos are peppy from a stop. The 3.5- and 3.9-liter V6s provide similar acceleration in around-town driving, but the 3.9 delivers better passing response in the 35-55 mph range. Chevrolet's V8 furnishes ample power at any speed. Ethanol-blended fuel, called E85, is increasingly available and can be less expensive than regular-grade gasoline, but mileage is reduced. E85 can be used in the 3.5-liter model. A test SS coupe averaged 17.2 mpg with abundant city driving, which is reasonably close to the EPA estimate. Chevrolet recommends regular-grade fuel for V6s, premium for V8s. Monte Carlo's 17-inch tires temper much of the unwanted motion, avoiding the float and wallow that plague Impalas with 16-inch tires. Little comfort penalty must be paid with the SS coupe, despite its sport suspension and 18-inch tires, though larger bumps are felt more readily in a Monte Carlo than an Impala. Expect stable handling, with well-balanced steering. The SS coupe has the sportiest moves, but no Monte Carlo feels truly agile. Stopping power is good, but Chevrolet should have made ABS standard on all models including the LS. Wind rush and tire roar both intrude somewhat-more than in Impala. In rapid acceleration, V6 engines emit a prominent growl. Subdued while cruising, V8s produce a "muscle car" rumble under throttle. As in Impalas, gauges are clearly marked and easy to read. Large radio/climate controls have easy-grip rubberized surfaces and operate smoothly. However, Monte Carlo climate controls are mounted too low for easy use, requiring a protracted look away from the road to adjust. Cabin materials are serviceable, but these models trail most like-priced imports for quality feel. Comfortable front seats offer adequate head and legroom. Decent visibility is compromised more than in Impala by thick rear pillars, sharply angled back window, and smallish outside rearview mirrors. Rear space is generous for a sporty coupe, but passengers taller than 5-foot-10 will want more headroom. A high step over the low seat complicates entry/exit into the rear, but wide doors help ease entry into the front of a Monte Carlo. Though average in size for a midsize car in general, the Monte Carlo's trunk is generous for a coupe. Cabin storage is adequate but no more.
Value for the Money
Monte Carlo is a throwback to the era of the midsize domestic coupe, trading passenger space and cargo room for a sporty profile. Strong performance and sharper moves in an SS coupe might be appealing, but plenty of sporty cars on the market make more sensible choices.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category |
Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS Rating |
|
Performance |
8 |
|
Fuel Economy |
4 |
|
Ride Quality |
5 |
|
Steering/Handling/Braking |
7 |
|
Quietness |
5 |
|
Controls/Materials |
4 |
|
Interior Room |
6 |
|
Room/Comfort (rear) |
3 |
|
Cargo Capacity |
4 |
|
Value within Class |
5 |
| Total Score: |
51 |
|
Each vehicle report contains one rating chart for representative model. Consumer
Guide® rates in ten key areas: Performance, Fuel Economy, Ride Comfort, Steering
and Handling, Interior Noise, Controls and Materials, Driver Room, Passenger Room,
Cargo Capacity, and Insurance Costs. These ratings compare the particular vehicle
rated to ALL other vehicles, not a vehicle's standing in a particular class. In the
ratings table, "1" is the lowest rating and "10" is the highest rating.