2005-2008 Chevrolet Equinox: Road Test

Despite having less horsepower than most of its rivals, Equinox furnishes lively takeoffs and smooth passing response. A test front-drive LT did 8.8 sec 0-60 mph. Expect the slightly heavier AWD versions to be a bit slower. Fuel economy is above average for the class. Front and AWD test models averaged 18.0 mpg. Also above average is Equinox's ride. This SUV benefits from its long wheelbase and comfort-biased suspension tuning. At the same time, that softness is a detriment to its handling. Body lean in turns is pronounced, and the steering suffers from vague feel. The available AWD is a wet-weather bonus but is not meant for serious off roading. Equinox is no more or less quiet than other midsize SUVs. Some testers believe the V6 engine sounds coarse in full-throttle acceleration. Others complain of tire roar and body drumming over rough pavement. The interior is a mixed bag. Most materials are appropriate for the price, but the cabin still has a cut-rate feel due to some hard plastic surfaces and imprecise switchgear movement. The power window switches are located on the console with the automatic transmission lever, which some testers feel is inconvenient. Seat comfort is good, with generous head and leg room both front and rear. The reclining, adjustable rear seat is a comfort plus. Visibility is hindered by thick front and rear pillars. And while the rear seats don't fold completely flat, Equinox has a flexible cargo hold. A fold-flat front passenger seat allows loading of longer items, and an adjustable height cargo shelf adds to cargo carrying options.

Value for the Money
Sloppy steering and handling make Equinox and its Pontiac Torrent cousin feel like cumbersome trucks, even though these SUVs have car-type chassis. Both also lack the mechanical finesse of competitors such as the Honda Pilot and Toyota Highlander. On the upside, Equinox and Torrent have an absorbent ride, versatile interiors, and prices that undercut those of most midsize rivals.