2003-2008 Toyota Matrix: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Toyota Matrix
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- All-wheel drive
- Cargo room
- Rear-seat room
- Fuel economy
Cons
- Engine noise
- Ride (XRS)
Vehicle Highlights
Toyota targeted a younger audience with its new-for-2003 crossover wagon, based on the redesigned Corolla subcompact sedan. Matrix shared engines and transmissions with the Corolla and Toyota's Celica sport coupe, but came with either front-wheel or all-wheel drive. Pontiac's new Vibe shared the Matrix design and powertrains, but was built in California with different styling. Matrix came in Standard, XR, and XRS trim levels, with a separate-opening window in a swing-up tailgate. Each used a 1.8-liter four-cylinder engine. All-wheel drive was optional on Standard and XR models, which had 130 horsepower with front-drive or 123 hp with AWD. Equipped with a 180-horsepower engine, the XRS was offered only with front-drive. Standard and XR models came with a five-speed manual transmission, but the XRS used only a six-speed manual. A four-speed automatic transmission was optional with front-drive, and included with AWD. Those AWD versions retained the front-drive's ride height, and were not intended for off-road use. Antilock braking was standard on XRS and AWD models, and optional for other versions. The XRS also had rear disc brakes. Front side airbags were optional for all models. Curtain side airbags were not offered. Included in XR and XRS models, and optional on the Standard, was a household-type power outlet. The XRS added aero body trim, and joined the front-drive XR in offering optional 17-inch wheels versus the Matrix's standard 16s. A navigation system and an in-dash six-disc CD changer were available for all models. Rivals included the Chrysler PT Cruiser, Ford Focus wagon, Subaru Forester, and Volkswagen Jetta wagon.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | XR w/AWD, auto. Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 3 | |
| Fuel Economy | 7 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 4 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 7 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 7 | |
| Value within Class | 10 | |
| Total Score: | 60 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 2003-2008 Toyota Matrix includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 2003-2008 Toyota Matrix and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 2003-2008 Toyota Matrix is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Though slightly tamer than Pontiac's Vibe in character, the Matrix is an interesting alternative to conventional small wagons and compact SUVs. Utility, fine road manners, available AWD, and Toyota-grade reliability are quite appealing. Those traits must, however, be measured against the needlessly noisy engines and the XRS model's harsher, high-strung nature.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | XR w/AWD, auto. Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 3 | |
| Fuel Economy | 7 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 4 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 7 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 7 | |
| Value within Class | 10 | |
| Total Score: | 60 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $750 |
| Alternator | $460 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $2,550 |
| Brakes | $470 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $650 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $1,550 |
| Exhaust System | $565 |
| Radiator | $780 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $1,710 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $450 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2008 | |||
| Matrix | $15,500-17,500 | $14,100-15,900 | $9,900-11,200 |
| 2007 | |||
| Matrix | $13,500-15,000 | $12,300-13,700 | $8,000-8,900 |
| 2006 | |||
| Matrix 2WD | $11,800-13,000 | $10,600-11,700 | $6,600-7,300 |
| Matrix AWD, XRS | $13,000-14,200 | $11,800-12,900 | $7,500-8,200 |
| 2005 | |||
| Matrix 2WD | $10,300-11,300 | $9,300-10,200 | $5,500-6,000 |
| Matrix AWD, XRS | $11,500-12,500 | $10,400-11,300 | $6,300-6,900 |
| 2004 | |||
| Matrix 2WD | $8,800-9,800 | $7,900-8,800 | $4,600-5,100 |
| Matrix AWD, XRS | $9,800-10,800 | $8,800-9,700 | $5,100-5,600 |
| 2003 | |||
| Matrix 2WD | $7,500-8,400 | $6,800-7,600 | $3,800-4,200 |
| Matrix AWD, XRS | $8,300-9,200 | $7,500-8,300 | $4,300-4,800 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door wagon (AWD) | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 102.4 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 171.3 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 69.9 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 61.0 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 2943 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 53.2 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 11.9 | |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 40.6 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 41.8 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 39.8 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 36.3 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| dohc I4 | 1.8 / 110 | 123-130 | 125 | 5-speed manual: 29/36 4-speed automatic: 28/33 |
5-speed manual: -- 4-speed automatic: -- |
| dohc I4 | 1.8 / 110 | 170-108 | 127-130 | 6-speed manual: 25/30 | 6-speed manual: -- |
|
With AWD and automatic, the EPA rating of the regular engine is 26/31 mpg. Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 2003 Matrix |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 5 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 5 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








