2003-2008 Toyota Matrix: Full Review

Updated: 11/23/08

2003 Toyota Matrix
2008 Toyota Matrix
View the Photo Gallery

2003-2008 Toyota Matrix 

  • Price Range:  $6,800 - $15,900
CG Rating

60

out of 100

About our Road Test

Related to Toyota Matrix

View Another Vehicle

Learn about the year-to-year changes and reliability for the 2003-2008 Toyota Matrix and our price chart details a range of prices based on vehicle mileage and condition.

Pros

  • All-wheel drive
  • Cargo room
  • Rear-seat room
  • Fuel economy

Cons

  • Engine noise
  • Ride (XRS)

Vehicle Highlights

Toyota targeted a younger audience with its new-for-2003 crossover wagon, based on the redesigned Corolla subcompact sedan. Matrix shared engines and transmissions with the Corolla and Toyota's Celica sport coupe, but came with either front-wheel or all-wheel drive. Pontiac's new Vibe shared the Matrix design and powertrains, but was built in California with different styling. Matrix came in Standard, XR, and XRS trim levels, with a separate-opening window in a swing-up tailgate. Each used a 1.8-liter four-cylinder engine. All-wheel drive was optional on Standard and XR models, which had 130 horsepower with front-drive or 123 hp with AWD. Equipped with a 180-horsepower engine, the XRS was offered only with front-drive. Standard and XR models came with a five-speed manual transmission, but the XRS used only a six-speed manual. A four-speed automatic transmission was optional with front-drive, and included with AWD. Those AWD versions retained the front-drive's ride height, and were not intended for off-road use. Antilock braking was standard on XRS and AWD models, and optional for other versions. The XRS also had rear disc brakes. Front side airbags were optional for all models. Curtain side airbags were not offered. Included in XR and XRS models, and optional on the Standard, was a household-type power outlet. The XRS added aero body trim, and joined the front-drive XR in offering optional 17-inch wheels versus the Matrix's standard 16s. A navigation system and an in-dash six-disc CD changer were available for all models. Rivals included the Chrysler PT Cruiser, Ford Focus wagon, Subaru Forester, and Volkswagen Jetta wagon.

Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)

Category XR w/AWD, auto. Rating
Performance 3
Fuel Economy 7
Ride Quality 5
Steering/Handling/Braking 5
Quietness 4
Controls/Materials 6
Interior Room 6
Room/Comfort (rear) 7
Cargo Capacity 7
Value within Class 10
Total Score: 60
Learn about the year-to-year changes of the 2003-2008 Toyota Matrix. Get full details of the styling and performance changes throughout the history of the 2003-2008 Toyota Matrix.

Year to Year Changes


2004 Toyota Matrix: Toyota's compact wagon changed little for 2004. An in-dash CD changer was optional in the XR and XRS, and the available navigation system was exclusive to XRS. During 2004, output of the XRS engine dropped to 170 horsepower.
2005 Toyota Matrix: An antiskid system became optional on front-drive versions of the 2005 Matrix, if equipped with an automatic transmission. Head-protecting curtain side airbags were now offered in an option group that also included front torso side airbags. All models exhibited a new front bumper, grille, and clear-lens taillamps. Toyota no longer offered a navigation system in the Matrix.
2006 Toyota Matrix: 2006 brought no changes for the Matrix.
2007 Toyota Matrix: Matrix lost its all-wheel-drive and sporty models for 2007. New for '07 was an M-Theory option package with 4-wheel disc brakes and special trim.
2008 Toyota Matrix: The 2008 Toyota Matrix carried over pending a redesign due in calendar 2008 as a 2009 model.

Our road test for the 2003-2008 Toyota Matrix includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 2003-2008 Toyota Matrix and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 2003-2008 Toyota Matrix is right for you.

Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation

Matrix engines need high rpm to deliver suitable power--especially the XRS. Front-drive 130-hp models feel almost as strong in most driving, producing acceptable acceleration with an automatic transmission and decent pickup with manual shift. AWD models are 260 pounds heavier, and have accelerated to 60 mph in about 11.5 seconds--which isn't so acceptable. A test XRS reached 60 mph in 8.5 seconds, and is liveliest above 5000 rpm. Fuel economy is a plus. Test AWD models have averaged 25.4 to 28.4 mpg. Front-drives with 130 hp and automatic averaged 26.6 mpg. Toyota recommends premium-grade fuel for the XRS. Ride quality varies somewhat, according to model and equipment. Front-drive models are firm yet compliant enough, as their 16-inch tires absorb most bumps. The XRS and others with 17-inch tires are noticeably harsher. They can get jittery over patchy pavement and freeway expansion joints. These tall wagons are more prone to crosswind wander at highway speeds than lower-built small cars. Even so, they ease though turns with grippy assurance and moderate lean, aided by crisp, direct steering. Optional 17-inch tires make cornering tenacious. ABS-equipped models produce good stopping performance. Sound levels are disappointing in every model. Engines are noisy and boomy in brisk acceleration, and not that relaxed even during typical highway cruising. Wind rush and coarse-surface tire thrum occur, too. Gauges are a bit small, set deep into tunnels--thus, they're not that easy to see in some daytime conditions. Their bright trim rings reflect in the windshield. The control layout is mostly simple and logical, but the optional navigation system absorbs most audio functions, has undersize buttons and a finicky "joystick" control, and is tough to figure out. Cabin finish and materials are sturdy, modern and youthful--in line with Matrix prices but short of Volkswagen-grade. The excellent driving position is only slightly elevated, but more upright than in a typical compact car. Front head room is fine, even with an optional sunroof. Long-legged adults might desire more stretch-out space. Comfort should be good on long trips, but seats lack adequate lateral support for spirited driving. Visibility is mostly good all around, but slightly cluttered over-the-shoulder. Rear-seat head and leg space is sufficient for two large adults, but knee clearance gets tight if front seatbacks are reclined. Also, the rear bench is not especially comfortable. Tall doors eliminate most stooping on entry/exit, but they could open wider. Floor-level passageways are fairly narrow. Cargo space is fine overall for the Matrix's exterior size. The front passenger seat folds flat for added versatility, as does the split rear seat. Small-items storage is bountiful, including a large glovebox and under-floor spaces around the spare tire.
Value for the Money
Though slightly tamer than Pontiac's Vibe in character, the Matrix is an interesting alternative to conventional small wagons and compact SUVs. Utility, fine road manners, available AWD, and Toyota-grade reliability are quite appealing. Those traits must, however, be measured against the needlessly noisy engines and the XRS model's harsher, high-strung nature.

Expert Ratings Summary

Category XR w/AWD, auto. Rating
Performance 3
Fuel Economy 7
Ride Quality 5
Steering/Handling/Braking 5
Quietness 4
Controls/Materials 6
Interior Room 6
Room/Comfort (rear) 7
Cargo Capacity 7
Value within Class 10
Total Score: 60

Each vehicle report contains one rating chart for representative model. Consumer Guide® rates in ten key areas: Performance, Fuel Economy, Ride Comfort, Steering and Handling, Interior Noise, Controls and Materials, Driver Room, Passenger Room, Cargo Capacity, and Insurance Costs. These ratings compare the particular vehicle rated to ALL other vehicles, not a vehicle's standing in a particular class. In the ratings table, "1" is the lowest rating and "10" is the highest rating.
Our reliability study for this generation Toyota Matrix includes details on average repair costs, manufacturer recalls, and everything you need to know to gauge the long-term reliability of this generation Toyota Matrix .

Trouble Spots

Consumer Guide's® Auto Editors have scoured repair bulletins and questioned mechanics to search for commonly occurring problems for a particular vehicle. In some cases we also give possible manufacturer-suggested solutions. In many instances these trouble spots are Technical Service Bulletins posted by the manufacturer, however, we have our own expert looking at additional vehicle problems.

Air conditioner: The A/C warning light may flash and the compressor clutch may fail to engage due to a faulty clutch relay. (2003-04)

Audio system: The CD player on some early-build vehicles makes a grinding noise during deceleration. (2003)

Battery: Whenever the battery is too low to start the vehicle, the relay for the daytime running lights (DRL) becomes damaged and a revised relay must be installed. (2003)

Battery: The battery dies because a faulty headlight switch is unable to turn the lights off and an updated switch is available. (2003)

Check-engine light: The check engine light may come on because of a very small leak in the evaporative emissions system charcoal canister. (2005)

Check-engine light: The oil fill nozzles used at some fast lube shops can bend the baffle under the oil fill hole causing engine noise and a possible check engine light. (2003-04)

Check-engine light: The check engine light may illuminate due to a faulty air/fuel ratio sensor. (2005-06)

Interior trim: The center console door won't close or stay closed unless noise deadening felt is installed under the hinges. (2003-04)

Suspension noise: A tapping noise that seems to be coming from the dash is actually from the upper suspension mount for the spring on which insulating material must be applied. (2003)

Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs

This table lists costs of likely repairs for comparison with other vehicles. The dollar amount includes the cost of the part(s) and labor (based on $50 per hour) for the typical repair without extras or add-ons. Like the pricing information, replacement costs can vary widely depending on region. Expect charges at a new-car dealership to be slightly higher.
Item Name Repair Cost
A/C Compressor $750
Alternator $460
Automatic Transmission or Transaxle $2,550
Brakes $470
Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing $650
Constant Velocity Joints $1,550
Exhaust System $565
Radiator $780
Shocks and/or Struts $1,710
Timing Chain or Belt $450
Our price chart for this generation Toyota Matrix details a range of prices in year-by-year listings based on vehicle mileage and condition.
Prices Good Average Poor
2008
Matrix $15,500-17,500 $14,100-15,900 $9,900-11,200
2007
Matrix $13,500-15,000 $12,300-13,700 $8,000-8,900
2006
Matrix 2WD $11,800-13,000 $10,600-11,700 $6,600-7,300
Matrix AWD, XRS $13,000-14,200 $11,800-12,900 $7,500-8,200
2005
Matrix 2WD $10,300-11,300 $9,300-10,200 $5,500-6,000
Matrix AWD, XRS $11,500-12,500 $10,400-11,300 $6,300-6,900
2004
Matrix 2WD $8,800-9,800 $7,900-8,800 $4,600-5,100
Matrix AWD, XRS $9,800-10,800 $8,800-9,700 $5,100-5,600
2003
Matrix 2WD $7,500-8,400 $6,800-7,600 $3,800-4,200
Matrix AWD, XRS $8,300-9,200 $7,500-8,300 $4,300-4,800
This chart details a range of prices in year-by-year listings for vehicles in three condition levels:
Good: a clean low-mileage, solid-running vehicle that needs little or no repair.
Average: a car with normal miles on the odometer, perhaps a few scrapes or dings; engine might need a minor repair or two, but runs acceptably well.
Poor: might have potentially dangerous problems with the engine and/or body, or abnormally high mileage; definitely in need of mechanical attention. Valuations reflect wholesale prices paid by dealers at auction, and retail prices on used-car lots. Each range covers all trim levels and engine types for a vehicle with a typical amount of equipment--usually an automatic transmission, air conditioning, stereo, etc. Fully loaded vehicles may cost more. Average mileage is 12,000 miles per year. Keep in mind that these are guidelines only. Actual selling prices vary- especially from region to region.
Specs for this generation Toyota Matrix include everything from fuel mileage to seating capacity to options availability.

Vehicle Dimensions

Specification 4-door wagon (AWD)
Wheelbase, in. 102.4
Overall Length, in. 171.3
Overall Width, in. 69.9
Overall Height, in. 61.0
Curb Weight, lbs. 2943
Cargo Volume, cu. ft. 53.2
Standard Payload, lbs. --
Fuel Capacity, gals. 11.9
Seating Capacity 5
Front Head Room, in. 40.6
Max. Front Leg Room, in. 41.8
Rear Head Room, in. 39.8
Max. Rear Leg Room, in. 36.3

Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist.


Powertrain Options and Availability

Standard and XR models held a 1.8-liter, dual-overhead-cam four-cylinder that developed 130 horsepower (123 with AWD) and 125 pound-feet of torque. Either a five-speed manual or four-speed automatic transmission may be installed. The Matrix XRS used a 180-horsepower version (later rated at 170) and came only with a six-speed manual transmission.
Engines Size liters /
cu. in
Horse- power Torque Transmission:
EPA city/hgwy
Consumer Guide Observed
dohc I4 1.8 / 110 123-130 125 5-speed manual: 29/36
4-speed automatic: 28/33
5-speed manual: --
4-speed automatic: --
dohc I4 1.8 / 110 170-108 127-130 6-speed manual: 25/30 6-speed manual: --

With AWD and automatic, the EPA rating of the regular engine is 26/31 mpg.

Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist.

Built In:  Canada
Drive Wheels: transverse front-engine/front- or all-wheel drive
Detailed safety information for this generation Toyota Matrix include detailed crash test scores from the NHTSA.

NHTSA Crash-Test Results

Test 2003 Matrix
Front Impact, Driver 5
Front Impact, Passenger 5

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.

Learn about official auto recalls, reliability issues, and vehicle problems for the 2003-2008 Toyota Matrix directly from the NHTSA and manufacturers.

NHTSA Recall History

2003-2004:

Car Buying Resources

Trade-in Calculator

Research how much your car is truly worth.

Trade-in Calculator

Used Cars

Search online classifieds and find a local dealer.

Search Local Listings

Vehicle History Report

Get a CARFAX Vehicle History Report. The first...

Get a CARFAX report

What's Under the Hood?

Learn about how cars work.

Learn Things

Insurance

We're dedicated to making insurance easier.

Get Insurance

Sell Your Car

Reach over 8 million buyers.

Sell Your Car

Search
Local Listings


to

submit

Vehicle
History Report

CARFAX

FREE CARFAX Record Check

Looking at a used car, check for costly hidden problems before
you buy.

Go
Advertisement
Advertisement