Our road test for the 2003-2008 Toyota Matrix includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the
2003-2008 Toyota Matrix and highlighted the vehicle's performance
with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation
2003-2008 Toyota Matrix is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Matrix engines need high rpm to deliver suitable power--especially the XRS. Front-drive 130-hp models feel almost as strong in most driving, producing acceptable acceleration with an automatic transmission and decent pickup with manual shift. AWD models are 260 pounds heavier, and have accelerated to 60 mph in about 11.5 seconds--which isn't so acceptable. A test XRS reached 60 mph in 8.5 seconds, and is liveliest above 5000 rpm. Fuel economy is a plus. Test AWD models have averaged 25.4 to 28.4 mpg. Front-drives with 130 hp and automatic averaged 26.6 mpg. Toyota recommends premium-grade fuel for the XRS. Ride quality varies somewhat, according to model and equipment. Front-drive models are firm yet compliant enough, as their 16-inch tires absorb most bumps. The XRS and others with 17-inch tires are noticeably harsher. They can get jittery over patchy pavement and freeway expansion joints. These tall wagons are more prone to crosswind wander at highway speeds than lower-built small cars. Even so, they ease though turns with grippy assurance and moderate lean, aided by crisp, direct steering. Optional 17-inch tires make cornering tenacious. ABS-equipped models produce good stopping performance. Sound levels are disappointing in every model. Engines are noisy and boomy in brisk acceleration, and not that relaxed even during typical highway cruising. Wind rush and coarse-surface tire thrum occur, too. Gauges are a bit small, set deep into tunnels--thus, they're not that easy to see in some daytime conditions. Their bright trim rings reflect in the windshield. The control layout is mostly simple and logical, but the optional navigation system absorbs most audio functions, has undersize buttons and a finicky "joystick" control, and is tough to figure out. Cabin finish and materials are sturdy, modern and youthful--in line with Matrix prices but short of Volkswagen-grade. The excellent driving position is only slightly elevated, but more upright than in a typical compact car. Front head room is fine, even with an optional sunroof. Long-legged adults might desire more stretch-out space. Comfort should be good on long trips, but seats lack adequate lateral support for spirited driving. Visibility is mostly good all around, but slightly cluttered over-the-shoulder. Rear-seat head and leg space is sufficient for two large adults, but knee clearance gets tight if front seatbacks are reclined. Also, the rear bench is not especially comfortable. Tall doors eliminate most stooping on entry/exit, but they could open wider. Floor-level passageways are fairly narrow. Cargo space is fine overall for the Matrix's exterior size. The front passenger seat folds flat for added versatility, as does the split rear seat. Small-items storage is bountiful, including a large glovebox and under-floor spaces around the spare tire.
Value for the Money
Though slightly tamer than Pontiac's Vibe in character, the Matrix is an interesting alternative to conventional small wagons and compact SUVs. Utility, fine road manners, available AWD, and Toyota-grade reliability are quite appealing. Those traits must, however, be measured against the needlessly noisy engines and the XRS model's harsher, high-strung nature.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category |
XR w/AWD, auto. Rating |
|
Performance |
3 |
|
Fuel Economy |
7 |
|
Ride Quality |
5 |
|
Steering/Handling/Braking |
5 |
|
Quietness |
4 |
|
Controls/Materials |
6 |
|
Interior Room |
6 |
|
Room/Comfort (rear) |
7 |
|
Cargo Capacity |
7 |
|
Value within Class |
10 |
| Total Score: |
60 |
|
Each vehicle report contains one rating chart for representative model. Consumer
Guide® rates in ten key areas: Performance, Fuel Economy, Ride Comfort, Steering
and Handling, Interior Noise, Controls and Materials, Driver Room, Passenger Room,
Cargo Capacity, and Insurance Costs. These ratings compare the particular vehicle
rated to ALL other vehicles, not a vehicle's standing in a particular class. In the
ratings table, "1" is the lowest rating and "10" is the highest rating.