2003-2007 Nissan Murano: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Nissan Murano
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- CVT performance
- Passenger room
- Cargo room
Cons
- Instruments/controls
Vehicle Highlights
Nissan launched a third SUV for 2003, a midsize Murano "crossover" built on the Altima sedan platform. Murano aimed at such car-based models as the Honda Pilot and Toyota Highlander, which it matched in general size, except for standing as much as four inches lower--despite standard 18-inch wheels. In their initial form, Muranos also seated only four passengers, versus rivals' five to seven. A 3.5-liter V6, as used in various Nissan car lines, was the sole engine. The only transmission was a new continuously variable automatic (CVT) which, like other CVTs, provided a near-infinite range of gear ratios. Muranos came with front-drive or all-wheel drive. Antilock four-wheel disc brakes with brake assist were standard. So were front torso side airbags, front/rear curtain side airbags, and seatbelt pretensioners for all passengers. Muranos had front bucket seats and a two-person split folding rear bench with backrest recliners. The center console offered bilevel storage, with space for a purse or laptop computer. Muranos came in two trim levels: base SL and sporty SE. Standard features included a tilt steering wheel/gauge cluster, and dual-zone climate control. A video-type information display controlled climate, audio and trip computer functions, along with the available navigation system. An antiskid/traction system, xenon headlamps, power-adjustable pedals, and leather interior trim were optional. Available for the SE was a manual-mode CVT with seven preprogrammed "gear ratios." Towing capacity was 3500 pounds. In addition to the Pilot and Highlander, competitors included the Ford Explorer--though none were as curvaceously stylish in profile as the Murano.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Murano AWD SL Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 6 | |
| Fuel Economy | 4 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 6 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 7 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 7 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 8 | |
| Value within Class | 8 | |
| Total Score: | 62 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 2003-2007 Nissan Murano includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 2003-2007 Nissan Murano and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 2003-2007 Nissan Murano is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Not everyone falls for its lush exterior look, or for its interior layout, but the Murano brings some seriously fashionable style to the ordinarily-conservative family-SUV world. Secure handling, fine utility, and CVT advantages are assets that add value beneath the skin. While it's no threat to unseat the Highlander or Honda Pilot for broad appeal, the Murano cuts quite a fine figure on the road and is among our Recommended midsize SUVs.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Murano AWD SL Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 6 | |
| Fuel Economy | 4 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 6 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 7 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 7 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 8 | |
| Value within Class | 8 | |
| Total Score: | 62 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $665 |
| Alternator | $450 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $3,705 |
| Brakes | $475 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $480 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $2,350 |
| Exhaust System | $640 |
| Radiator | $600 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $2,795 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $595 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2007 | |||
| Murano 2WD | $18,000-20,300 | $16,600-18,700 | $11,500-13,000 |
| Murano AWD | $19,500-22,500 | $17,900-20,700 | $12,700-14,600 |
| 2006 | |||
| Murano 2WD | $16,500-19,000 | $15,000-17,300 | $10,600-12,200 |
| Murano AWD | $17,800-20,000 | $16,400-18,400 | $11,400-12,800 |
| 2005 | |||
| Murano 2WD | $15,300-17,300 | $13,900-15,700 | $9,800-11,100 |
| Murano AWD | $16,500-18,500 | $15,000-16,800 | $10,600-11,800 |
| 2004 | |||
| Murano 2WD | $14,200-15,300 | $12,900-13,900 | $8,700-9,300 |
| Murano AWD | $15,400-16,400 | $14,000-14,900 | $9,900-10,500 |
| 2003 | |||
| Murano 2WD | $13,000-14,000 | $11,800-12,700 | $7,500-8,100 |
| Murano AWD | $14,200-15,200 | $12,900-13,800 | $8,700-9,300 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door wagon | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 111.2 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 187.6 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 74.0 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 66.5 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3955 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 81.6 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 21.7 | |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 40.7 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 43.4 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 39.7 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 36.1 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| dohc V6 | 3.5 / 214 | 240-245 | 246 | CVT automatic: 20/24 | CVT automatic: 19.6 |
|
EPA rating with 2WD is 20/25 mpg. Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 20043 Murano |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 5 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 5 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








