Also in the 2003 Mercedes-Benz G-Class Review:
1.
2.
Mercedes-Benz G-Class Road Test
3.
4.
Our road test for the 2003 Mercedes-Benz G-Class includes a full evaluation of the
2003 Mercedes-Benz G-Class from the inside out. We evaluate not only engine and
handling performance for the 2003 Mercedes-Benz G-Class, but also interior cabin
and cargo space. Let our comprehensive road test ratings for the
2003 Mercedes-Benz G-Class help you decide if a 2003 Mercedes-Benz G-Class is right for
you.
Consumer Guide® Road Test Ratings
Acceleration
Test G500 clocked a respectable 7.9 sec 0-60 mph, helped by smooth, quick-shifting transmission. Midrange pickup is adequate, reflecting hefty weight and poor aerodynamics. Haven't yet tested G55, for which Mercedes claims 7.2 sec 0-60.
Fuel Economy
Both Gs require premium fuel--and lots of it. Test G500s averaged 13.0 mpg in mixed city/highway use, 12.8 including gas-eating performance tests. G55 likely thirstier still.
Ride Quality
Surprisingly stable, given firm, off-road-oriented suspension. Some chop due to short wheelbase, but never punishing. Still, most every other big SUV furnishes superior comfort.
Steering/Handling/Braking
Again, no match for more-modern rivals, but not as bad as tall, narrow build might suggest. Still, fast turns trigger tippy cornering feel, and most crosswinds cause highway wander. Steering very firm, and wheel is slow to return to center after turns. Brakes deliver sure, reasonably short simulated panic stops with little nosedive.
Quietness
Wind, tire noise rise markedly over 45 mph. Much full-throttle engine roar.
Controls
Clear gauge cluster. Complex Mercedes COMAND video system governs navigation/audio/cell phone. Most other switches are handy and mostly self-explanatory except for low-mounted, undersized climate controls. Weak dashboard night lighting. Old-fashioned, square-cut interior shapes, but materials are high quality, include wood trim. Creaks, groans over rail tracks at odds with otherwise-solid bearing.
Room/Comfort/Driver Seating (front)
Head room beyond generous, but cabin feels narrow in this 30-year-old design. Seats needlessly hard to some testers. Smallish footwells and lofty step-in complicate entry/exit; standard side steps help little. Drivers can easily see both front fenders, but elevated stance, headrest clutter, and dark-tint glass block much vision astern and over-the-shoulder.
Room/Comfort (rear)
Hard, flat bench seat high off floor, so head room only very good. But that also means steep step-in. And only fair leg room unless front seats well forward.
Cargo Room
Split 70/30 rear bench double-folds for cargo, but stiff latches on test G500s required undue muscle. Rear wheel arches steal some cargo space, but there's plenty of volume for big, tall boxes. Side-opening cargo door is clumsy--partly because it carries heavy, bulky outside spare tire. Small-items storage nothing special.
Value within Class
The G-Class achieved some celebrity cachet as a private import, one reason Mercedes began offering it through its own dealers during 2002. But this old soldier suffers too many lapses for what it costs. Other luxury SUVs--including Mercedes' own M-Class--furnish far better everyday comfort, refinement, and performance, usually for far less money.
Total Score
| G500 |
Class Average |
| 40 |
49.3 |
Scores for all Premium Large Sport-utility Vehicles
| Low Score |
|
23 |
| Average Score |
|
49 |
| High Score |
|
64 |
Also in the 2003 Mercedes-Benz G-Class Review:
1.
2.
Mercedes-Benz G-Class Road Test
3.
4.