Our road test for the 2002-2006 Nissan Altima includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the
2002-2006 Nissan Altima and highlighted the vehicle's performance
with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation
2002-2006 Nissan Altima is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
There's a lot to like about the latest Altimas. Nissan forecasted that four-cylinder engines would account for 80 percent of Altima sales. Early tests put automatic transmission versions at 8.6 seconds for 0-60 mph acceleration. That's competitive with rival four-cylinder Honda Accords and Volkswagen Passats, and slightly quicker than Toyota Camrys. But Altima's four cylinder is unrefined compared to its rivals', being buzzy and coarse in all but gentle cruising. The robust V6 is as smooth and responsive as any competitor's. Acceleration to 60 mph in 6.9 seconds, with automatic, places the 3.5 SE among the quickest midsize sedans. EPA gas-mileage estimates are similar to those of Accord and Camry, which have less horsepower. A 2.5 S averaged 23.9 mpg in mostly highway driving. An SE with automatic got only 17.6 mpg including performance testing, but 24.9 mpg when traveling mainly on the highway. Altima's 20-gallon fuel tank is the largest in the midsize class. Nissan recommends premium fuel for the V6. A rigid structure and smart suspension design pay off in a comfortable, controlled ride. Four-cylinder models feel particularly absorbent over ruts and crests. More-aggressive tires firm up the 3.5 SE's ride, but it's not jarring. Handling is good overall, despite overly sensitive straightline steering feel. Confident roadholding and good balance in turns help make the 3.5 SE crisper in all respects, thanks to its wider, lower-profile tires. On the other hand, a wide turning circle frustrates around-town driving and parking. Also, torque steer can make the 3.5 SE feel a little too spirited during brisk acceleration. Braking is strong, and easily modulated in ABS-equipped models. The growling, vibratory four-cylinder engine offsets fine suppression of road and wind noise. All models suffer a metallic drumming resonance on coarse pavement. Gauges are deep-set in instrument-panel coves, but brightly backlit for great readability even in daylight. Dashboard design is clean, contemporary, and user-friendly. The wiggle worm automatic-transmission shift gate invites easy manual gear changes, but doesn't suit everyone. Manual gearboxes on early models worked crudely. An arching roof creates generous head room. Leg room also is good, as is seat comfort and bolstering. The driver gets height adjustment in all but base models. All Altimas have handy height-adjustable center armrests. Separate levers for steering-wheel tilt and telescoping adjustments is unorthodox, but provides greater-than-usual range of motion. Outward visibility is hampered slightly by a tall rear deck and by occasional reflections off light-colored dashboard tops. Large, wide rear door openings ease entry/exit. Comfortable well-contoured seating offers plenty of knee and toe space. But head room for those over 5-feet-8 is constrained, and three-across adult seating is a squeeze. Two cupholders sit in the folding center armrest. Low-grade plastics inside, and a tinny clang of the trunklid, proved disappointing. Altimas have a wide trunk with low liftover, but lid hinges dip into the cargo area. All models have a 60/40 split fold-down rear seatback for added versatility.
Value for the Money
Nissan finally got a genuine Camry/Accord alternative in the moderately priced midsize class. Strong on features for the money, the Altima gained a spunky personality, especially in sporty 3.5 SE guise. Not as refined or well-built as a Camry, Accord or Passat, the latest Altima is nevertheless strongly recommended. Four-cylinder models satisfy most needs.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category |
Nissan Altima 3.5 SE w/automatic transmission Rating |
|
Performance |
6 |
|
Fuel Economy |
4 |
|
Ride Quality |
6 |
|
Steering/Handling/Braking |
7 |
|
Quietness |
6 |
|
Controls/Materials |
7 |
|
Interior Room |
6 |
|
Room/Comfort (rear) |
5 |
|
Cargo Capacity |
4 |
|
Value within Class |
6 |
| Total Score: |
57 |
|
Each vehicle report contains one rating chart for representative model. Consumer
Guide® rates in ten key areas: Performance, Fuel Economy, Ride Comfort, Steering
and Handling, Interior Noise, Controls and Materials, Driver Room, Passenger Room,
Cargo Capacity, and Insurance Costs. These ratings compare the particular vehicle
rated to ALL other vehicles, not a vehicle's standing in a particular class. In the
ratings table, "1" is the lowest rating and "10" is the highest rating.