Our road test for the 2002-2005 Ford Thunderbird includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the
2002-2005 Ford Thunderbird and highlighted the vehicle's performance
with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation
2002-2005 Ford Thunderbird is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Full-throttle standing-start acceleration was good in the 2002 model. But the 2002s were sometimes slow to respond in the 35-55 mph range, because the transmission did not always downshift promptly. Later models feel strong at all speeds, able to reach 60 mph in 7.2 seconds. However, sloppy, indecisive gear changes and tardy downshifts still frustrate smooth delivery of power and inhibit passing response. The manual-shift feature does not help much, either. Fuel economy is subpar. Test 2002 examples averaged 16.3 to 20.5 mpg in a mix of city and highway driving. Ford recommends premium fuel. Although the Thunderbird's ride is not as smooth or solid as might be expected, it's more compliant than most two-seat convertibles. That's especially with the top down, when bumps can be absorbed by body flex. Expect significant top-down cowl shake over bumps, but rigidity is okay with the hardtop in place. Serving as a relaxed cruiser, the T-Bird is too big and heavy to be sports-car agile, especially in tight maneuvers. Still, the two-seater exhibits good steering response, modest body lean, and good cornering grip. Quietness is another virtue. A cozy coupe with hardtop in place, the Thunderbird is among the quieter convertibles with the soft top up or down. Relatively minor wind disturbance is evident with the top down, but normal conversation is possible with the windows up. Road noise and the exhaust note are appropriately subdued, and the engine emits a satisfying whine in full acceleration. The convertible top is nicely lined and insulated. Smaller-sized gauges improved the 2003 instrument cluster, but they retained a hard-to-read black-on-white scheme with turquoise needles. Audio and climate controls are close to the driver, but look-alike climate buttons can be confusing. A convenient central latch on the windshield header manually releases the soft top, which powers down in about 8 seconds. Overall, the cabin falls short of seriously upscale in appearance and feel, with run-of-the-mill materials and, in some cases, indifferent assembly. Optional body-color interior trim looks jazzy, but some of it has a tacky, painted appearance. Thunderbirds are wider than most two-seaters, but long-legged folks might find footwells confining. With the top up, tall occupants will want more head room. The driving position is nicely tailored via a standard power tilt/telescopic steering wheel, but seats are fairly hard and mostly flat. Outward vision is compromised by thick windshield pillars and, top-up, by short side windows and the top's wide rear quarters. The hardtop's porthole corner windows help some, but vision for lane changes is still blocked by the right headrest. Entry/exit is better than in most two-seaters, aided by conventional ride height, though long doors can frustrate in tight spaces. Careful packing gets a couple's small bags into the shallow trunk, but it won't accept tall objects. A bin behind the seats is suitable for purse or briefcase, but nearly inaccessible with the top up. There's a small glovebox, console bin, map pockets, and two console cupholders, but no ashtray.
Value for the Money
Ford aimed the Thunderbird at "relaxed sportiness," and basically hit the mark--though sales slumped after initial high demand. The two-seater is not as mechanically refined as it should be, and interior materials fail to impress. Even so, Thunderbird is more practical than a genuine sports car. As a near-luxury two-passenger V8 convertible, it's in a class by itself.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category |
Ford Thunderbird Premium Rating |
|
Performance |
6 |
|
Fuel Economy |
4 |
|
Ride Quality |
5 |
|
Steering/Handling/Braking |
7 |
|
Quietness |
4 |
|
Controls/Materials |
7 |
|
Interior Room |
6 |
|
Room/Comfort (rear) |
0 |
|
Cargo Capacity |
2 |
|
Value within Class |
4 |
| Total Score: |
45 |
|
Each vehicle report contains one rating chart for representative model. Consumer
Guide® rates in ten key areas: Performance, Fuel Economy, Ride Comfort, Steering
and Handling, Interior Noise, Controls and Materials, Driver Room, Passenger Room,
Cargo Capacity, and Insurance Costs. These ratings compare the particular vehicle
rated to ALL other vehicles, not a vehicle's standing in a particular class. In the
ratings table, "1" is the lowest rating and "10" is the highest rating.