2001-2003 Oldsmobile Aurora Full Review
Date Published: 2/20/08
Also in the 2001-2003 Oldsmobile Aurora Review:
6.
7.
Oldsmobile Aurora Full Review
8.
9.
10.
Our in-depth review covers everything you need to know about this generation
Oldsmobile Aurora. Get the latest news, find a local dealer, and get a free
price quote for this generation Oldsmobile Aurora.
2001-2003 Oldsmobile Aurora Review
Oldsmobile's near-luxury Aurora was redesigned for a spring 2000 debut, as a 2001 model. In the fall, Oldsmobile's flagship gained a standard automatic load leveling suspension. GM's OnStar system became standard on all Auroras in fall 2000. Smaller than the 1995-99 first-generation design in most dimensions, the 21st century Aurora shared its basic platform with the Buick LeSabre and Pontiac Bonneville. Both V6 and V8 engines were offered. The only transmission was a four-speed automatic. Certain rivals, such as the Lincoln LS and Acura TL, offered a five-speed automatic. Seating five, the Aurora had standard front side airbags, antilock four-wheel disc brakes, automatic climate control, leather upholstery, and wood interior trim. The V8 versions rode 17-inch wheels, in place of the V6's 16-inchers, and included traction control and Oldsmobile's antiskid Precision Control System. Both of those systems were optional with V6 sedans.
Year to Year Changes
2002 Oldsmobile Aurora:
Oldsmobile's flagship lost its V6 version part way into the 2002 model year, as part of GM's phaseout of the Olds brand. A tire-inflation monitor was standard. New for 2002 was a "navigational radio" system that stored maps on CDs and gave directions via a dashboard-mounted screen or by audio instructions. Chrome exhaust tips became standard for 2002.
2003 Oldsmobile Aurora:
For the Aurora's final year, the V6 engine was gone and all models used V8 power. Production came to a halt in late spring of 2003. The final 500 Auroras had Collector Edition trim with special wheels, paint, and badging.
2001-2003 Oldsmobile Aurora Road Test
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
|
|
Acceleration (V8) |
Rear visibility |
|
|
Passenger room |
Climate controls |
|
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Oldsmobile's Aurora was a credible attempt at an import-flavored near-luxury sedan, but a nose-heavy front-wheel-drive configuration keeps it from being as athletic as most European sport sedans. Overly firm suspension settings upset body control on rough pavement, resulting in an unsettled, stiff-kneed ride--not unlike a Cadillac Seville STS. That drawback apart, the suspension copes comfortably with most surfaces and the steering provides good feedback. In acceleration, the V6 proves to be a pleasant surprise, feeling nearly as strong as a V8 from a stop, and also in highway passing situations. Impressive at all speeds, the V8 has the edge in 30-50 mph passing response. Automatic transmissions are different for each engine, but both are smooth and alert. Fuel economy can vary considerably. A test V6 Aurora averaged 21 mpg, and a V8 just 14.1 mpg. Oldsmobile has recommended 89-octane fuel for both engines. A stiff structure helps keep wind and tire noise low. Engines are fairly subdued even when pushed, though they don't sound as classy as the best import brands. Braking is strong and drama-free, although some Auroras tested when new had an overly firm brake pedal that was difficult to modulate. Despite its trimmer exterior dimensions, the 2001-03 Aurora is roomier than the original version. Six-footers get plenty of knee clearance in front or back, and have more than adequate head room even with the intrusion of a sunroof. Adjustments are sufficient so any driver can get comfortably situated, although the front lumbar support might feel too prominent. Though spacious, back-seat comfort is subpar. The cushion is too small and too soft to provide much support. Entry/exit poses no problems. The dashboard layout generally works well, although the audio unit sits low in the center and requires a long look away from the road to adjust. Redundant steering-wheel audio buttons help. Climate controls are a tad complex, too. Aurora's transmission gear selector has a notched gate that encourages do-it-yourself shifting, though it's not as precise as the separate shift gate on such rivals as the Acura TL and Lincoln LS. Visibility directly astern is marred by the high tail and a bulky center stoplamp. The trunk is generous, with a large opening and low liftover, but the lid hinges dip into the cargo area. Padded interior surfaces abound, and real wood is a genuine luxury. But these upscale cues were mitigated by creaking dashboard panels on most Auroras tested as new cars.
Value for the Money
Few other sedans in this class offer a V8, but an Aurora isn't likely to tempt Lexus or BMW owners. Even so, this is a pleasant, slightly sporty sedan that should appeal to value-minded near-luxury buyers. Resale-value dropoff due to the decline of the Oldsmobile brand could produce some good buys on the used-car market.
Consumer Guide® Road Test Ratings
| Oldsmobile Aurora V8 |
Rating |
|
|
| Performance |
7 |
|
|
| Fuel Economy |
3 |
|
|
| Ride Quality |
6 |
|
|
| Steering/Handling/Braking |
6 |
|
|
| Quietness |
7 |
|
|
| Controls/Materials |
5 |
|
|
| Interior Room |
7 |
|
|
| Room/Comfort (rear) |
5 |
|
|
| Cargo Capacity |
4 |
|
|
| Value within Class |
3 |
|
|
| Total: |
53 |
Each vehicle report contains one rating chart for representative model. Consumer
Guide® rates in ten key areas: Performance, Fuel Economy, Ride Comfort, Steering
and Handling, Interior Noise, Controls and Materials, Driver Room, Passenger Room,
Cargo Capacity, and Insurance Costs. These ratings compare the particular vehicle
rated to ALL other vehicles, not a vehicle's standing in a particular class. In the
ratings table, "1" is the lowest rating and "10" is the highest rating.
2001-2003 Oldsmobile Aurora Reliability
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide's® Auto Editors have scoured repair bulletins and questioned mechanics to search
for commonly occurring problems for a particular vehicle. In some cases we also give possible manufacturer-suggested
solutions. In many instances these trouble spots are Technical Service Bulletins posted by the manufacturer,
however, we have our own expert looking at additional vehicle problems.
Air conditioner:
Body joints in the area of the cabin air filter allow water to saturate the filter, causing poor A/C and defroster performance, especially at high blower speed. (2001-02)
Air conditioner:
On early production vehicles, the temperature sensor in the air conditioning compressor pops out causing refrigerant loss and no A/C. (2001)
Electrical problem:
A loose electrical connector at the transmission illuminates the check engine light and makes shifting rough. (2000-03)
Poor transmission shift:
Late shifts and flares between shifts may be due to a faulty shift solenoid. (2001)
Poor transmission shift:
Certain transmissions may suffer harsh engagement in reverse (2001); delayed upshifts (2001); slipping in 4th gear (2001); or poor pickup, slips, delayed shifts, and flares (2001-02).
Steering noise:
A problem with the power steering gear valve causes a moaning noise during slow speed turns. (2001-02)
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
This table lists costs of likely repairs for comparison with other vehicles. The
dollar amount includes the cost of the part(s) and labor (based on $50 per hour) for the
typical repair without extras or add-ons. Like the pricing information, replacement
costs can vary widely depending on region. Expect charges at a new-car dealership
to be slightly higher.
|
|
|
| A/C Compressor |
$595 |
|
| Alternator |
$395 |
|
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle |
$1,890 |
|
| Brakes |
$430 |
|
| Constant Velocity Joints |
$1,125 |
|
| Exhaust System |
$485 |
|
| Radiator |
$515 |
|
| Shocks and/or Struts |
$1,850 |
|
| Timing Chain or Belt |
$995 |
|
|
NHTSA Recall History
2001:
Brake hydraulic control unit may have internal leak, leading to failure of rear brake proportioning, antilock brake, traction control, or stability control features. Dealers will inspect the ABS hydraulic modulator and replace the hydraulic modulator if necessary.
2002-03 V8:
Faulty fuel tank sensors may have been installed in certain vehicles, leading to fuel leakage. Dealer will inspect and replace all affected parts.
2002-03:
Driver's side airbag inflator could fracture at a weld during a deployment, leading to potential injury. Dealers will inspect, and replace if necessary, the driver side air bag module assembly.
2001-2003 Oldsmobile Aurora Prices
|
|
| 2001 |
| Aurora V6 |
$5,000-5,800 |
$4,300-4,900 |
$2,000-2,300 |
| Aurora V8 |
$6,200-7,000 |
$5,400-6,100 |
$2,700-3,000 |
|
| 2002 |
| Aurora V6 |
$6,800-7,800 |
$6,100-6,900 |
$3,200-3,700 |
| Aurora V8 |
$8,300-9,300 |
$7,500-8,400 |
$4,300-4,800 |
|
| 2003 |
| Aurora V8 |
$10,800-12,000 |
$9,700-10,800 |
$5,800-6,500 |
|
|
This chart details a range of prices in year-by-year listings for vehicles in three condition levels:
Good: a clean low-mileage, solid-running vehicle that needs little or no repair.
Average: a car with normal miles on the odometer, perhaps a few scrapes or dings;
engine might need a minor repair or two, but runs acceptably well.
Poor: might have potentially dangerous problems with the engine and/or body, or
abnormally high mileage; definitely in need of mechanical attention. Valuations
reflect wholesale prices paid by dealers at auction, and retail prices on used-car
lots. Each range covers all trim levels and engine types for a vehicle with a typical
amount of equipment--usually an automatic transmission, air conditioning, stereo,
etc. Fully loaded vehicles may cost more. Average mileage is 12,000 miles per year. Keep
in mind that these are guidelines only. Actual selling prices vary- especially from
region to region.
2001-2003 Oldsmobile Aurora Specs & Safety
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification |
4-door sedan |
|
|
| Wheelbase, in. |
112.2 |
|
|
| Overall Length, in. |
199.3 |
|
|
| Overall Width, in. |
72.9 |
|
|
| Overall Height, in. |
56.7 |
|
|
| Curb Weight, lbs. |
3627 |
|
|
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. |
14.9 |
|
|
| Standard Payload, lbs. |
-- |
|
|
| Fuel Capacity, gals. |
18.5 |
|
|
| Seating Capacity |
5 |
|
|
| Front Head Room, in. |
38.6 |
|
|
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. |
42.5 |
|
|
| Rear Head Room, in. |
37.7 |
|
|
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. |
38.0 |
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist.
Powertrain Options and Availability
In 2001-02, Auroras came with a choice of dual-overhead-cam engines. The 3.5 liter V6 produced 215 horsepower, versus 250 hp for the 4.0-liter V8. Both engines drove a four-speed automatic transmission. Only the V8 remained into the 2003 model year.
| Engines |
Size liters / cu. in |
Horse- power |
Torque |
Transmission: EPA city/hgwy |
Consumer Guide Observed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| dohc V6 |
3.5 / 212 |
215 |
230 |
4-speed automatic: 18/27 |
4-speed automatic: 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| dohc V8 |
4.0 / 244 |
250 |
260 |
4-speed automatic: 18/26 |
4-speed automatic: 14.1 |
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist.
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test |
2001 Aurora |
|
|
| Front Impact, Driver |
4 |
|
|
| Front Impact, Passenger |
4 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's
worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to
rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury:
5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Side-impact
crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%;
1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover
when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%;
2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.
Built In:
USA
Drive Wheels:
transverse front-engine/front-wheel drive
Also in the 2001-2003 Oldsmobile Aurora Review:
6.
7.
Oldsmobile Aurora Full Review
8.
9.
10.