Our road test for the 2001-2003 Oldsmobile Aurora includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the
2001-2003 Oldsmobile Aurora and highlighted the vehicle's performance
with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation
2001-2003 Oldsmobile Aurora is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Oldsmobile's Aurora was a credible attempt at an import-flavored near-luxury sedan, but a nose-heavy front-wheel-drive configuration keeps it from being as athletic as most European sport sedans. Overly firm suspension settings upset body control on rough pavement, resulting in an unsettled, stiff-kneed ride--not unlike a Cadillac Seville STS. That drawback apart, the suspension copes comfortably with most surfaces and the steering provides good feedback. In acceleration, the V6 proves to be a pleasant surprise, feeling nearly as strong as a V8 from a stop, and also in highway passing situations. Impressive at all speeds, the V8 has the edge in 30-50 mph passing response. Automatic transmissions are different for each engine, but both are smooth and alert. Fuel economy can vary considerably. A test V6 Aurora averaged 21 mpg, and a V8 just 14.1 mpg. Oldsmobile has recommended 89-octane fuel for both engines. A stiff structure helps keep wind and tire noise low. Engines are fairly subdued even when pushed, though they don't sound as classy as the best import brands. Braking is strong and drama-free, although some Auroras tested when new had an overly firm brake pedal that was difficult to modulate. Despite its trimmer exterior dimensions, the 2001-03 Aurora is roomier than the original version. Six-footers get plenty of knee clearance in front or back, and have more than adequate head room even with the intrusion of a sunroof. Adjustments are sufficient so any driver can get comfortably situated, although the front lumbar support might feel too prominent. Though spacious, back-seat comfort is subpar. The cushion is too small and too soft to provide much support. Entry/exit poses no problems. The dashboard layout generally works well, although the audio unit sits low in the center and requires a long look away from the road to adjust. Redundant steering-wheel audio buttons help. Climate controls are a tad complex, too. Aurora's transmission gear selector has a notched gate that encourages do-it-yourself shifting, though it's not as precise as the separate shift gate on such rivals as the Acura TL and Lincoln LS. Visibility directly astern is marred by the high tail and a bulky center stoplamp. The trunk is generous, with a large opening and low liftover, but the lid hinges dip into the cargo area. Padded interior surfaces abound, and real wood is a genuine luxury. But these upscale cues were mitigated by creaking dashboard panels on most Auroras tested as new cars.
Value for the Money
Few other sedans in this class offer a V8, but an Aurora isn't likely to tempt Lexus or BMW owners. Even so, this is a pleasant, slightly sporty sedan that should appeal to value-minded near-luxury buyers. Resale-value dropoff due to the decline of the Oldsmobile brand could produce some good buys on the used-car market.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category |
Oldsmobile Aurora V8 Rating |
|
Performance |
7 |
|
Fuel Economy |
3 |
|
Ride Quality |
6 |
|
Steering/Handling/Braking |
6 |
|
Quietness |
7 |
|
Controls/Materials |
5 |
|
Interior Room |
7 |
|
Room/Comfort (rear) |
5 |
|
Cargo Capacity |
4 |
|
Value within Class |
3 |
| Total Score: |
53 |
|
Each vehicle report contains one rating chart for representative model. Consumer
Guide® rates in ten key areas: Performance, Fuel Economy, Ride Comfort, Steering
and Handling, Interior Noise, Controls and Materials, Driver Room, Passenger Room,
Cargo Capacity, and Insurance Costs. These ratings compare the particular vehicle
rated to ALL other vehicles, not a vehicle's standing in a particular class. In the
ratings table, "1" is the lowest rating and "10" is the highest rating.