2001 Dodge Intrepid: Road Test
Archived Review
2001 Dodge Intrepid ▼
Select a Trim ▼
- MSRP: $20,910 -$24,975
- Invoice: $19,424 -$23,083
Features & Specifications
Compare Vehicle
Related to Dodge Intrepid
Previous Year's Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Our road test for the 2001 Dodge Intrepid includes a full evaluation of the 2001 Dodge Intrepid from the inside out. We evaluate not only engine and handling performance for the 2001 Dodge Intrepid, but also interior cabin and cargo space. Let our comprehensive road test ratings for the 2001 Dodge Intrepid help you decide if a 2001 Dodge Intrepid is right for you.
Advertisement
ACCELERATION
| Base, 2.7 V6 | ES, 3.2 V6 | R/T | Class Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 5.6 |
R/T's 3.5 V6 is slightly stronger than the Intrepid/Concorde 3.2. Both engines have good low-speed punch and passing power. The 2.7 feels overworked at highway speeds.
FUEL ECONOMY
| Base, 2.7 V6 | ES, 3.2 V6 | R/T | Class Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 5 | 5 | 4.8 |
Impressive with 2.7-liter: 26.2 mpg in our tests with mostly highway miles; 3.2s averaged about 21. We haven't had an opportunity to measure the R/T's fuel economy.
RIDE QUALITY
| Base, 2.7 V6 | ES, 3.2 V6 | R/T | Class Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 7 | 5 | 6.1 |
Firm and stable, but not harsh on rough pavement. Base and ES have same suspension tuning. R/T has firmer setup, but doesn't ride much harder.
STEERING/HANDLING/BRAKING
| Base, 2.7 V6 | ES, 3.2 V6 | R/T | Class Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
Poised and controlled. Among the best full-size sedans. R/T feels even more composed. Braking is short and straight. Intrepids we've tested tended to have slightly better brake-pedal feel than test Concordes.
QUIETNESS
| Base, 2.7 V6 | ES, 3.2 V6 | R/T | Class Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
Noise levels are comparable to most similarly priced competitors.
CONTROLS
| Base, 2.7 V6 | ES, 3.2 V6 | R/T | Class Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 6 | 6 | 5.3 |
Handy and well designed, though the radio is a bit of a reach. Interior assembly is sound, but hard plastic parts compromise an otherwise pleasing cabin.
ROOM/COMFORT/DRIVER SEATING (FRONT)
| Base, 2.7 V6 | ES, 3.2 V6 | R/T | Class Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
Roomy, but 6-footers could use a bit more leg room. Front bench's inboard position is suited only for children--who should be in back. High rear shelf hurts aft visibility.
ROOM/COMFORT (REAR)
| Base, 2.7 V6 | ES, 3.2 V6 | R/T | Class Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 7 | 7 | 5.9 |
Terrific leg room. Plenty of head space, but Concorde's taller roofline provides slightly more clearance. Doorways are big, but the rear door shape hampers entry.
CARGO ROOM
| Base, 2.7 V6 | ES, 3.2 V6 | R/T | Class Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 6 | 6 | 5.8 |
Trunk is huge. Flat floor extends far forward, but liftover is high. Folding rear seatback on Intrepid ES and R/T is more versatile than Concorde's pass-through.
VALUE WITHIN CLASS
| Base, 2.7 V6 | ES, 3.2 V6 | R/T | Class Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 7 |
Intrepid targets the sportier buyer, while Concorde's message is one of stylish comfort. Both do their jobs well, being roomy, athletic, and competitively priced. Their reputation for reliability lags behind that of such rivals as the Toyota Avalon and Buick LeSabre, but overall, Concorde and Intrepid are impressive values.
Total Score
| Base, 2.7 V6 | ES, 3.2 V6 | R/T | Class Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63 | 64 | 62 | 58.5 |
Total Score: 63
Scores for all Large Cars














