2000-2006 Mazda MPV: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Mazda MPV
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Handling/roadholding
- Cargo room
- Instruments/controls
- Passenger room
Cons
- Acceleration (2000-01)
- Automatic-transmission performance
Vehicle Highlights
Built in Japan, Mazda's minivan earned its first redesign since the vehicle appeared back in 1989. Sliding rear side doors replaced the previous swing-out doors. Instead of rear-wheel drive, the 2000 model had front-wheel drive. Base DX, upscale LX and luxury-oriented ES versions went on sale. All used a 2.5-liter, dual-overhead-cam V6 engine, based on a Ford design. (Ford was Mazda's parent company.) A four-speed automatic was the sole transmission. Antilock braking was standard on LX and ES models, but not available at all on the DX. Dual sliding side doors contained roll-down windows, which ranked as a minivan "first." Power door operation was not available. All MPVs seated seven. Second-row buckets could slide together to create a two-passenger bench. The three-place, third-row bench seat folded flat into the floor. The midrange LX minivan had cruise control, power windows, and power door locks. Mazda's ES minivan added front side airbags, leather upholstery, and rear air conditioning. Rivals included the Dodge Caravan, Honda Odyssey, and Toyota Sienna.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Mazda MPV LX Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 2 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 7 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 6 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 9 | |
| Value within Class | 6 | |
| Total Score: | 56 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 2000-2006 Mazda MPV includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 2000-2006 Mazda MPV and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 2000-2006 Mazda MPV is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Although the small 2000-01 engine is easily overtaxed, the MPV does an admirable job of packaging people and cargo, while delivering sporty handling. Still, a Caravan or Odyssey is roomier and more powerful.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Mazda MPV LX Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 2 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 7 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 6 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 9 | |
| Value within Class | 6 | |
| Total Score: | 56 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $650 |
| Alternator | $410 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $1,200 |
| Brakes | $465 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $410 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $750 |
| Exhaust System | $450 |
| Radiator | $475 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $140 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $350 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2006 | |||
| MPV ES | $14,300-15,500 | $13,000-14,100 | $8,900-9,600 |
| MPV LX | $11,500-12,500 | $10,400-11,300 | $6,300-6,900 |
| 2005 | |||
| MPV ES | $12,000-13,000 | $10,800-11,700 | $6,700-7,300 |
| MPV LX | $9,800-10,800 | $8,800-9,700 | $5,100-5,600 |
| 2004 | |||
| MPV ES | $9,700-10,700 | $8,700-9,600 | $5,000-5,600 |
| MPV LX | $8,300-9,300 | $7,500-8,400 | $4,300-4,800 |
| 2003 | |||
| MPV ES | $8,000-9,000 | $7,200-8,100 | $4,100-4,600 |
| MPV LX | $6,700-7,700 | $5,900-6,800 | $3,100-3,500 |
| 2002 | |||
| MPV ES | $6,500-7,500 | $5,700-6,600 | $2,900-3,400 |
| MPV LX | $5,200-6,100 | $4,400-5,200 | $2,100-2,400 |
| 2001 | |||
| MPV DX, LX | $3,800-4,700 | $3,100-3,900 | $1,200-1,500 |
| MPV ES | $5,000-5,900 | $4,300-5,000 | $2,000-2,400 |
| 2000 | |||
| MPV DX, LX | $2,800-3,500 | $2,100-2,600 | $600-800 |
| MPV ES | $3,900-4,600 | $3,200-3,800 | $1,200-1,400 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door van | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 111.8 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 187.0 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 72.1 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 68.7 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3657 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 127.0 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 18.5 | |
| Seating Capacity | 7 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 41.0 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 40.8 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 39.3 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 37.0 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| dohc V6 | 2.5 / 152 | 170 | 165 | 4-speed automatic: 18/23 | 4-speed automatic: -- |
| dohc V6 | 3.0 / 182 | 200 | 200 | 5-speed automatic: -- | 5-speed automatic: -- |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
Vehicle crash test information not available at this time.The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








