2000-2005 Saturn L-Series: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Saturn L
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Acceleration (V6)
- Steering/handling
- Cargo room (wagon)
Cons
- Rear-seat comfort
- Noise
Vehicle Highlights
The L-Series sedan and station wagon could have a V6 instead of the four cylinder common to the smaller S-Series. The new front-drive midsize 4-door sedan and wagon were based on the German-made Opel Vectra. Assembled in Delaware, the L-Series used Saturn's familiar dent- and rust-resistant polymer panels for front fenders, doors, and bumper fascias. Other body parts were made of steel. Sedans came in LS, LS1, and LS2 form. Wagons were named LW1 and LW2. LS, LS1, and LW1 models used a new GM 4-cylinder engine. The LS2 and LW2 borrowed a 3.0-liter V6 from Saab, another GM company, but omitted Saab's turbocharger. LS and LS1 vehicles could have 5-speed manual shift or a 4-speed automatic transmission; the others were automatic-only. All models seated five and had 60/40 split folding rear seatbacks. LS2 and LW2 versions had 4-wheel disc brakes. Antilock brakes were optional, coupled with traction control.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Saturn L300 Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 6 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 6 | |
| Value within Class | 6 | |
| Total Score: | 53 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 2000-2005 Saturn L-Series includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 2000-2005 Saturn L-Series and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 2000-2005 Saturn L-Series is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Though not class leaders, L-Series models satisfy in most performance areas. Although cabins are roomy, they're furnished modestly. New-car prices undercut those of comparable Accord and Camry models, and Saturns are likely to remain lower than those competitors on the used-car market.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Saturn L300 Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 6 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 6 | |
| Value within Class | 6 | |
| Total Score: | 53 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $475 |
| Alternator | $260 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $1,110 |
| Brakes | $360 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $570 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $770 |
| Exhaust System | $370 |
| Radiator | $350 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $490 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $280 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2005 | |||
| L300 | $9,000-10,200 | $8,100-9,200 | $4,700-5,300 |
| 2004 | |||
| L300, LW300 4-cyl. | $7,000-7,900 | $6,200-7,000 | $3,300-3,700 |
| L300, LW300 V6 | $8,000-9,500 | $7,200-8,600 | $4,100-4,800 |
| 2003 | |||
| L200, LW200 | $5,200-6,000 | $4,400-5,100 | $2,100-2,400 |
| L300, LW300 | $6,200-7,000 | $5,400-6,100 | $2,700-3,000 |
| 2002 | |||
| L100, L200, LW200 | $3,800-4,500 | $3,100-3,700 | $1,200-1,400 |
| L300, LW300 | $5,000-5,800 | $4,300-4,900 | $2,000-2,300 |
| 2001 | |||
| L100, L200, LW200 | $3,100-3,800 | $2,400-3,000 | $700-900 |
| L300, LW300 | $4,000-4,700 | $3,300-3,900 | $1,300-1,500 |
| 2000 | |||
| LS, LS1, LW1 | $2,600-3,200 | $1,900-2,400 | $500-700 |
| LS2, LW2 | $3,400-4,000 | $2,700-3,200 | $900-1,000 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door sedan | 4-door wagon |
| Wheelbase, in. | 106.5 | 106.5 |
| Overall Length, in. | 190.4 | 190.4 |
| Overall Width, in. | 69.0 | 69.0 |
| Overall Height, in. | 56.4 | 57.3 |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 2910 | 3075 |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 17.5 | 71.3 |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | -- |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 13.1 | 13.1 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Front Head Room, in. | 39.3 | 39.3 |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 42.2 | 42.3 |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 38.0 | 39.6 |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 34.4 | 37.0 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| dohc I4 | 2.2 / 134 | 135-137 | 142-147 | 5-speed manual: 24/32 4-speed automatic: 23/32 |
5-speed manual: -- 4-speed automatic: 26.6 |
| dohc V6 | 3.0 / 183 | 182 | 190 | 4-speed automatic: 20/26 | 4-speed automatic: 19 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 2000 SL |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 4 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 5 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








