2000-2005 Mercury Sable: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Mercury Sable
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Cargo room
- Handling/roadholding
- Rear-seat comfort
Cons
- Low-speed acceleration
Vehicle Highlights
Like the similar Ford Taurus, Mercury's front-drive midsize sedan and wagon earned a major design update for 2000, including a fresh grille and hood, as well as a reworked tail. Inside, the dashboard was revised and additional storage spaces provided. Sables came in base GS, upscale LS, and LS Premium trim. Standard engine was a 153-horsepower 3.0-liter V6. A 200-hp twincam V6 went into the LS Premium and was optional on the LS. Both engines came only with a four-speed automatic transmission. Front head/chest side airbags, antilock brakes, and traction control were optional; 16-inch tires were standard. Sedans had an emergency inside trunklid release. All Sables had Ford's Advanced Restraints System, designed to minimize airbag injuries to front-seat occupants by gauging crash severity and such variables as seat position. The system then determined whether to deploy the front airbags, and with how much force. Unlike the Taurus wagon, Mercury's version did not come with a 2-place third-row seat, and therefore was limited to six occupants. Power-adjustable pedals were standard on LS models, optional on the GS.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Mercury Sable LS Premium Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 6 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 8 | |
| Value within Class | 7 | |
| Total Score: | 59 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 2000-2005 Mercury Sable includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 2000-2005 Mercury Sable and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 2000-2005 Mercury Sable is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Sable and Taurus returned to their roots with the 2000 redesign. Now contemporary in styling, a Sable provides fine road manners, excellent utility, an array of safety features, with a modestly more luxurious feel than a Taurus. Despite acceleration limitations and marginal ride comfort, Sables are worth considering.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Mercury Sable LS Premium Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 6 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 8 | |
| Value within Class | 7 | |
| Total Score: | 59 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $405 |
| Alternator | $535 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $1,120 |
| Brakes | $240 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $990 |
| Exhaust System | $300 |
| Radiator | $405 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $1,100 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $180 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2005 | |||
| Sable GS | $7,200-8,200 | $6,400-7,300 | $3,500-4,000 |
| Sable LS | $8,600-9,900 | $7,700-8,900 | $4,500-5,100 |
| 2004 | |||
| Sable GS | $6,000-7,000 | $5,200-6,100 | $2,500-2,900 |
| Sable LS | $7,200-8,200 | $6,400-7,300 | $3,500-4,000 |
| 2003 | |||
| Sable GS | $5,000-5,800 | $4,300-4,900 | $2,000-2,300 |
| Sable LS | $6,100-7,500 | $5,300-6,500 | $2,600-3,200 |
| 2002 | |||
| Sable GS | $4,100-4,800 | $3,400-3,900 | $1,400-1,600 |
| Sable LS | $5,000-5,900 | $4,300-5,000 | $2,000-2,400 |
| 2001 | |||
| Sable GS | $3,500-4,100 | $2,800-3,300 | $900-1,100 |
| Sable LS | $3,900-4,800 | $3,200-3,900 | $1,200-1,500 |
| 2000 | |||
| Sable GS | $3,100-3,700 | $2,400-2,900 | $700-900 |
| Sable LS | $3,400-4,000 | $2,700-3,200 | $900-1,000 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door sedan | 4-door wagon |
| Wheelbase, in. | 108.5 | 108.5 |
| Overall Length, in. | 200.5 | 197.7 |
| Overall Width, in. | 73.0 | 73.0 |
| Overall Height, in. | 55.5 | 58.0 |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3375 | 3540 |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 16.0 | 81.3 |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | -- |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 16.0 | 16.0 |
| Seating Capacity | 6 | 6 |
| Front Head Room, in. | 39.8 | 39.3 |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 42.2 | 42.2 |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 36.7 | 38.7 |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 38.9 | 38.5 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohv V6 | 3.0 / 182 | 153 | 182 | 4-speed automatic: 19/28 | 4-speed automatic: -- |
| dohc V6 | 3.0 / 181 | 200 | 200 | 4-speed automatic: 20/28 | 4-speed automatic: 18.4 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 2000 Sable |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 5 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 5 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








