2000-2004 Volvo 40 series: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Volvo 40/50 series
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Ride
- Brake performance
- Steering/handling
Cons
- Rear-seat room
Vehicle Highlights
Volvo introduced a pair of Dutch-built, front-drive compacts for 2000, to join its larger models. With both the S40 sedan and its V40 wagon companion, they wanted to attract younger buyers than the Swedish automaker's traditional customers. Rivals included the Acura TL, Audi A4, Infiniti I30, and Lexus ES 300. With a 100.4-inch wheelbase, the sedan and wagon ranked among the smallest cars in the near-luxury segment. They were also among the least expensive. Under the hood, a 160-horsepower turbocharged four-cylinder engine worked with a four-speed automatic transmission. Standard safety features included side-impact airbags, four-wheel disc antilock braking, and front-seat head restraints that were designed to minimize whiplash injury in a collision. Sedans had a trunk pass-through in the back seat. Wagons had a standard split folding rear seat. Heated front seats were available in an optional Cold Weather package. Other options included traction control, leather upholstery, a power moonroof, and integrated rear child-booster seats.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Volvo S40 Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 6 | |
| Ride Quality | 6 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 4 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 4 | |
| Total Score: | 47 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 2000-2004 Volvo S40/V40 includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 2000-2004 Volvo S40/V40 and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 2000-2004 Volvo S40/V40 is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
While delivering a generally solid driving feel, the S40/V40 do not have the same quality of interior materials or detailed workmanship as Swedish-built Volvos. Fully equipped models get a bit pricey, impairing overall value. An Acura TL or Infiniti I30/I35 is roomier, quicker, and more refined.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Volvo S40 Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 6 | |
| Ride Quality | 6 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 4 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 4 | |
| Total Score: | 47 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $610 |
| Alternator | $390 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $1,445 |
| Brakes | $220 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $0 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $880 |
| Exhaust System | $345 |
| Radiator | $300 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $750 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $235 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2004 | |||
| New S40 2.4i | $10,800-11,800 | $9,700-10,600 | $5,800-6,400 |
| New S40 T5 | $12,500-13,600 | $11,300-12,200 | $7,100-7,800 |
| S40 sedan | $9,200-10,500 | $8,300-9,500 | $4,800-5,500 |
| V40 wagon | $10,000-11,300 | $9,000-10,200 | $5,200-5,900 |
| 2003 | |||
| S40 sedan | $7,200-8,200 | $6,400-7,300 | $3,500-4,000 |
| V40 wagon | $7,900-8,900 | $7,100-8,000 | $4,000-4,500 |
| 2002 | |||
| S40 sedan | $5,600-6,500 | $4,800-5,600 | $2,300-2,700 |
| V40 wagon | $6,300-7,200 | $5,500-6,300 | $2,800-3,200 |
| 2001 | |||
| S40 sedan | $4,700-5,500 | $3,900-4,600 | $1,800-2,100 |
| V40 wagon | $5,200-6,000 | $4,400-5,100 | $2,100-2,400 |
| 2000 | |||
| S40 sedan | $4,000-4,800 | $3,300-3,900 | $1,300-1,500 |
| V40 wagon | $4,400-5,200 | $3,700-4,300 | $1,500-1,800 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door sedan | 4-door wagon |
| Wheelbase, in. | 100.9 | 100.9 |
| Overall Length, in. | 176.4 | 176.4 |
| Overall Width, in. | 67.7 | 67.7 |
| Overall Height, in. | 55.5 | 55.5 |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 2990 | 3040 |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 13.2 | 61.3 |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | -- |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 15.8 | 15.8 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Front Head Room, in. | 38.7 | 38.7 |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 41.4 | 41.4 |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 37.2 | 38.3 |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 32.7 | 32.7 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| Turbocharged dohc I4 | 1.9 / 116 | 160-170 | 175-177 | 4-speed automatic: 22/32 5-speed automatic: 22/32 |
4-speed automatic: 21.6 5-speed automatic: -- |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
Vehicle crash test information not available at this time.The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








