Our road test for the 2000-2004 Nissan Xterra includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the
2000-2004 Nissan Xterra and highlighted the vehicle's performance
with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation
2000-2004 Nissan Xterra is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Nissan intended the Xterra to be backpack-functional and contemporary cool, yet in some ways it's rather stodgy. Acceleration is plodding with the 4 cylinder, but adequate with the V6. The automatic transmission works well, as do the brakes. An automatic 2WD SE reached 60 mph in 9.6 seconds. Even in 2WD form, the suspension is stiff enough to cause notable jiggle on bumpy pavements, though it won't pummel a person's kidneys. Cornering grip is decent for a high, narrow SUV, but steering is vague on-center. Compared to the nimble Honda CR-V, an Xterra feels rather ponderous. Fuel economy is midsize-level, not compact-frugal. One new 2WD V6 averaged 17.2 mpg; another just 14.6 mpg in harder driving, while a 4WD SE S/C averaged just 13.4 mpg with the supercharged V6. While it doesn't match a CR-V or Toyota RAV4 in convenient all-surface 4WD, an Xterra--which has a Low range--is designed to lead those rivals in off-road capability. An Xterra eagerly tackles difficult mountain trails, but its V6 drones under hard throttle, and a nagging wind whistle from the roof rack adds to intrusive noise levels. Nissan's no-frills approach is evident in utilitarian cabin furnishings. Most interior trim panels are noticeably thin, as is the door glass, though seat fabrics look durable. The simple dashboard works well, though lanky drivers might crave more rearward seat travel and using the "umbrella handle" parking brake is an old-fashioned chore. Lowish front bucket seats promise good head room for tall occupants, but impel a slightly legs-out posture. Rear head room is terrific, because the kicked-up roofline allows the bench seat to stand higher. Sadly, three grownups won't fit easily in back. Rear leg room is minimal unless front seats are pushed forward, and the back bench is hard. Step-in is high, and rear door bottoms are so narrow that entry/exit is a real squeeze. Cargo space beats a CR-V or RAV4 with the rear seat up.
Value for the Money
Though less pleasant for everyday driving than the CR-V and RAV4, an Xterra offers truck toughness and off-road ability, along with V6 power. A V6 Xterra costs less than one of those less roomy 4-cylinder competitors.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category |
Nissan Xterra SE w/4WD Rating |
|
Performance |
4 |
|
Fuel Economy |
4 |
|
Ride Quality |
3 |
|
Steering/Handling/Braking |
3 |
|
Quietness |
3 |
|
Controls/Materials |
5 |
|
Interior Room |
6 |
|
Room/Comfort (rear) |
3 |
|
Cargo Capacity |
7 |
|
Value within Class |
5 |
| Total Score: |
43 |
|
Each vehicle report contains one rating chart for representative model. Consumer
Guide® rates in ten key areas: Performance, Fuel Economy, Ride Comfort, Steering
and Handling, Interior Noise, Controls and Materials, Driver Room, Passenger Room,
Cargo Capacity, and Insurance Costs. These ratings compare the particular vehicle
rated to ALL other vehicles, not a vehicle's standing in a particular class. In the
ratings table, "1" is the lowest rating and "10" is the highest rating.