2000-2002 Jaguar S-Type: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Jaguar S-Type
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Acceleration (V8)
- Quietness
- Handling/roadholding
- Ride
Cons
- Automatic-transmission performance (V6)
- Navigation-system controls
- Cargo room
Vehicle Highlights
Introduced in spring 1999 as an early 2000 model, Jaguar's smaller rear-drive luxury sedan shared its platform with the Lincoln LS, since both companies were part of Ford Motor Company. Unlike the Lincoln, however, the S-Type was built in Britain using mostly Jaguar-specific components. Seating five, the four-door sedan came in two versions, with two different engines. The 3.0 sedan used a 3.0-liter V6, derived from a Ford design. The S-Type 4.0 held a 4.0-liter Jaguar V8. Both engines drove a Ford/Jaguar five-speed automatic transmission. Lincoln's LS used its own versions of each engine. Traction control and antilock all-disc braking were standard, along with front head/chest side airbags. Options included a Weather Package with Jaguar's antiskid Dynamic Stability Control, and a Sport Package with computer-controlled shock absorbers and high-speed tires on 17-inch wheels. A Deluxe Communications Package included an in-dash navigation system/cell-phone assistance system, plus voice-activated control for the phone, audio, and climate functions. Optional Reverse Park Control sounded an alert as the car backed toward an obstacle. As the 2000 model year officially began in autumn 1999, the S-Type added a trunk pull-down strap and switched to restyled alloy wheels. Rivals included the BMW 5-Series, Mercedes-Benz E-Class, and Lexus GS 300/400.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Jaguar S-Type 3.0 Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 7 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 7 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 3 | |
| Total Score: | 50 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 2000-2002 Jaguar S-Type includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 2000-2002 Jaguar S-Type and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 2000-2002 Jaguar S-Type is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Blending traditional Jaguar charm with modern engineering, the S-Type ranks as good value in an upper-crust sedan, though it's not as sporty as BMW's 5-Series. Reliability under Ford's jurisdiction should be better than Jaguars of the past.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Jaguar S-Type 3.0 Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 7 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 7 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 3 | |
| Total Score: | 50 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $410 |
| Alternator | $395 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $1,095 |
| Brakes | $345 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $615 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $900 |
| Exhaust System | $665 |
| Radiator | $350 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $1,875 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $610 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2002 | |||
| S-Type 3.0 | $9,500-10,800 | $8,600-9,700 | $4,900-5,600 |
| S-Type 4.0 | $10,500-11,700 | $9,500-10,500 | $5,600-6,200 |
| 2001 | |||
| S-Type 3.0 | $8,000-9,000 | $7,200-8,100 | $4,100-4,600 |
| S-Type 4.0 | $8,900-9,800 | $8,000-8,800 | $4,600-5,100 |
| 2000 | |||
| S-Type 3.0 | $7,000-7,900 | $6,200-7,000 | $3,300-3,700 |
| S-Type 4.0 | $7,800-8,700 | $7,000-7,800 | $4,000-4,400 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door sedan | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 114.5 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 191.3 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 71.6 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 55.7 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3650 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 13.1 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 18.4 | |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 38.6 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 43.1 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 36.4 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 37.7 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| dohc V8 | 4.0 / 244 | 281 | 287 | 5-speed automatic: 17/23 | 5-speed automatic: -- |
| dohc V6 | 3.0 / 181 | 240 | 221 | 5-speed automatic: 18/26 | 5-speed automatic: 19.5 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
Vehicle crash test information not available at this time.The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








