1998-2004 Volvo C70: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Volvo C70
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Acceleration
- Build quality
- Standard antilock brakes
- Side airbags
- Steering/handling
Cons
- Rear-seat entry/exit
- Rear-seat room
- Ride (17-inch wheel models)
Vehicle Highlights
After making its reputation for decades with conservative, boxy sedans and station wagons, Volvo sought to update its image. Leading the charge into the future was this swoopy C70 coupe, which was Volvo's first coupe body style in seven years. Based on the front-wheel-drive S70 sedan and V70 wagon (which were 1998 updates of the 850 series), the coupe has similar exterior dimensions. Seating four instead of five, it wore curvier 2-door styling. Unlike the S70/V70, which offered a choice of three 5-cylinder engines, the C70 coupe came only with the most powerful version: a turbocharged dual-overhead-cam 2.3-liter, rated at 236 horsepower. A 5-speed manual transmission was standard, but most buyers were expected to take the optional automatic, which had Sport, Economy, and Winter shift modes. Only one well-equipped model went on sale, with standard front and side airbags, antilock brakes, 17-inch alloy wheels, and a power tilt/slide moonroof. Factory options were limited to a firmer sport suspension with 18-inch wheels, as well as a package comprising traction control, heated front seats, full leather upholstery and a 425-watt, 14-speaker audio system. Rivals included the BMW 3-Series coupe, Lexus SC 300/400, and Mercedes-Benz CLK. A convertible joined the coupe later in the season. Equipped with a power top and electrically defrosted glass rear window, the convertible and "base" coupe now used a turbocharged 190-horsepower 2.4-liter engine with automatic transmission. A sportier coupe model kept the initial 236-horsepower, 2.3-liter 5-cylinder.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Volvo C70 coupe Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 7 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 4 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 2 | |
| Total Score: | 47 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1998-2004 Volvo C70 includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1998-2004 Volvo C70 and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1998-2004 Volvo C70 is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Looks can be deceiving on the used-car market, as shoppers learn quickly. Volvo's 2-door companions are suave in shape, perform admirably, and offer excellent amenities, but Mercedes-Benz just might have the edge in quality and refinement for this league. Overall, all recent Volvo models have been solid and well-built. The coupe is no different. Volvo has aimed the C70 at young-thinking empty-nesters ready for something with more style and sizzle than a minivan, sport-utility vehicle--or a Volvo sedan. Our experience suggests that the C70 is a worthy entry into that market and should be considered. Still, we'd pick the more refined Mercedes-Benz CLK320 coupe or convertible. Next to that example of excellence, Volvo's otherwise able C70 comes across almost as crude.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Volvo C70 coupe Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 7 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 4 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 2 | |
| Total Score: | 47 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $585 |
| Alternator | $410 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $920 |
| Brakes | $310 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $650 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $1,150 |
| Exhaust System | $445 |
| Radiator | $475 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $1,435 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $415 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2004 | |||
| C70 convertible | $14,000-16,000 | $12,700-14,600 | $8,500-9,800 |
| 2003 | |||
| C70 convertible | $11,500-13,000 | $10,400-11,700 | $6,300-7,200 |
| 2002 | |||
| C70 convertible | $9,500-11,000 | $8,600-9,900 | $4,900-5,700 |
| C70 coupe | $7,800-9,000 | $7,000-8,100 | $4,000-4,600 |
| 2001 | |||
| C70 convertible | $8,000-9,300 | $7,200-8,400 | $4,100-4,700 |
| C70 coupe | $6,200-7,200 | $5,400-6,300 | $2,700-3,100 |
| 2000 | |||
| C70 convertible | $7,300-8,300 | $6,600-7,500 | $3,600-4,100 |
| C70 coupe | $5,300-6,500 | $4,600-5,600 | $2,200-2,700 |
| 1999 | |||
| C70 convertible | $6,800-7,600 | $6,100-6,800 | $3,200-3,600 |
| C70 coupe | $4,800-6,000 | $4,000-5,000 | $1,800-2,300 |
| 1998 | |||
| C70 convertible | $6,300-7,000 | $5,500-6,200 | $2,800-3,100 |
| C70 coupe | $4,500-5,300 | $3,700-4,400 | $1,600-1,900 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 2-door convertible | 2-door coupe |
| Wheelbase, in. | 104.9 | 104.9 |
| Overall Length, in. | 185.6 | 185.7 |
| Overall Width, in. | 71.5 | 71.5 |
| Overall Height, in. | 56.0 | 55.7 |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3630 | 3365 |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 8.0 | 13.1 |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | -- |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 18.5 | 18.5 |
| Seating Capacity | 4 | 4 |
| Front Head Room, in. | 37.4 | 37.4 |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 41.3 | 41.3 |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 36.6 | 36.6 |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 34.6 | 34.6 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| Turbocharged ohc I5 | 2.4 / 149 | 190-197 | 199 | 4-speed automatic: 19/26 | 4-speed automatic: 20 |
| Turbocharged dohc I5 | 2.3 / 141 | 236-242 | 243-244 | 5-speed manual: 19/26 4-speed automatic: 18/25 |
5-speed manual: 20 4-speed automatic: 19.9 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
Vehicle crash test information not available at this time.The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








