1998-2004 Isuzu Rodeo: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Isuzu Rodeo
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Acceleration (V6)
- Standard antilock braking
- Passenger and cargo room
Cons
- Engine noise
- Road noise
- Fuel economy
Vehicle Highlights
Redesigning of Isuzu's U.S.-built midsize sport-utility vehicle gave it rounded styling and extra power. Honda again marketed a retrimmed Rodeo as the Passport. Both were built from an Isuzu design at the Subaru-Isuzu assembly plant in Indiana. Just slightly longer than its predecessor, the revised Rodeo measured four inches wider. Shortening the wheelbase by 2.3 inches helped reduce curb weight by 285 pounds. A flip-up rear window was retained from the prior generation, but a side-hinged tailgate replaced the former drop-down gate. Ordinarily, the spare tire sat under the cargo area, but an externally mounted spare tire was a no-charge option. Two Rodeo versions were offered: S and better-equipped LS, with either 2-wheel drive or part-time 4-wheel drive, the latter for use on slippery surfaces only. A dashboard switch replaced a floor lever to activate the 4WD shift-on-the-fly transfer case. A 4-cylinder engine was standard on the 2-wheel-drive Rodeo S, while a 205-horsepower, 3.2-liter V6 was standard on the LS and available on the S. A manual transmission was standard with either engine, but automatic came only with the V6. A Rodeo could tow as much as 4500 pounds. Dual airbags were installed in a redesigned dashboard. Four-wheel antilock braking was standard, not optional as before. Rivals included the Chevrolet Blazer, Jeep Grand Cherokee, Ford Explorer, and Toyota 4Runner.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Isuzu Rodeo LS 4WD Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4 | |
| Fuel Economy | 3 | |
| Ride Quality | 2 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 4 | |
| Quietness | 4 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 8 | |
| Value within Class | 3 | |
| Total Score: | 44 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1998-2004 Isuzu Rodeo includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1998-2004 Isuzu Rodeo and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1998-2004 Isuzu Rodeo is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
With the V6, a Rodeo accelerates better than most Japanese rivals, leaning toward the "sport" side of sport utility. Prices are not cheap, however, and Rodeo has no standout features that put it above the competition. That makes it an acceptable choice, but not a compelling one.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Isuzu Rodeo LS 4WD Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4 | |
| Fuel Economy | 3 | |
| Ride Quality | 2 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 4 | |
| Quietness | 4 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 8 | |
| Value within Class | 3 | |
| Total Score: | 44 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $685 |
| Alternator | $295 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $620 |
| Brakes | $280 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $1,110 |
| Exhaust System | $320 |
| Radiator | $660 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $200 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $100 |
| Universal Joints | $120 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2004 | |||
| Rodeo 2WD | $7,200-8,200 | $6,400-7,300 | $3,500-4,000 |
| Rodeo 4WD | $8,500-9,700 | $7,700-8,700 | $4,400-5,000 |
| 2003 | |||
| Rodeo 2WD | $5,500-6,400 | $4,700-5,500 | $2,300-2,600 |
| Rodeo 4WD | $6,800-7,800 | $6,100-6,900 | $3,200-3,700 |
| 2002 | |||
| Rodeo 2WD | $4,200-5,500 | $3,400-4,500 | $1,400-1,900 |
| Rodeo 4WD | $5,300-6,800 | $4,600-5,800 | $2,200-2,800 |
| Rodeo LSE 2WD | $6,000-6,900 | $5,200-6,000 | $2,500-2,900 |
| Rodeo LSE 4WD | $7,000-8,000 | $6,200-7,100 | $3,300-3,800 |
| 2001 | |||
| Rodeo 2WD | $3,500-4,800 | $2,800-3,800 | $900-1,300 |
| Rodeo 4WD | $4,500-5,700 | $3,700-4,700 | $1,600-2,100 |
| Rodeo LSE 2WD | $5,200-6,000 | $4,400-5,100 | $2,100-2,400 |
| Rodeo LSE 4WD | $5,800-6,600 | $5,000-5,700 | $2,400-2,800 |
| 2000 | |||
| Rodeo 2WD | $2,900-4,000 | $2,200-3,000 | $700-900 |
| Rodeo 4WD | $4,000-5,000 | $3,300-4,100 | $1,300-1,600 |
| Rodeo LSE 2WD | $4,600-5,300 | $3,900-4,500 | $1,700-2,000 |
| Rodeo LSE 4WD | $5,200-6,000 | $4,400-5,100 | $2,100-2,400 |
| 1999 | |||
| Rodeo 2WD | $2,500-3,400 | $1,800-2,500 | $500-700 |
| Rodeo 4WD | $3,500-4,300 | $2,800-3,400 | $900-1,200 |
| Rodeo LSE 2WD | $3,800-4,500 | $3,100-3,700 | $1,200-1,400 |
| Rodeo LSE 4WD | $4,500-5,200 | $3,700-4,300 | $1,600-1,900 |
| 1998 | |||
| Rodeo 2WD | $2,200-3,000 | $1,600-2,100 | $400-600 |
| Rodeo 4WD | $3,000-3,800 | $2,300-2,900 | $700-900 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door wagon | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 106.4 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 176.7-183.7 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 70.4 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 68.8 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3860-4124 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 81.1 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 21.1 | |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 38.9 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 42.1 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 38.3 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 35.0 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| dohc V6 | 3.5 / 213 | 250 | 246 | 4-speed automatic: 17/21 | 4-speed automatic: -- |
| dohc V6 | 3.2 / 193 | 205 | 214 | 5-speed manual: 16/20 4-speed automatic: 18/20 |
5-speed manual: 17.4 4-speed automatic: 16.2 |
| dohc I4 | 2.2 / 134 | 129-130 | 144 | 5-speed manual: 21/24 4-speed automatic: 17/22 |
5-speed manual: -- 4-speed automatic: -- |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1999 Rodeo |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 4 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 4 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








