Our road test for the 1998-2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the
1998-2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK and highlighted the vehicle's performance
with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation
1998-2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
A CLK320 hit 60 mph in just 7 seconds, and yielded decent 21.6-mpg gas mileage--using the mandatory premium fuel. The CLK430 is slightly sleepy off the line but then rockets ahead, in keeping with Mercedes' claim of a 6.1-second 0-60 time. That one averaged 20.2 mpg. We haven't timed a 430 or CLK55, but in test drives, both seem up to Mercedes' 0-60 claims of 6.1 and around 5 sec, respectively. Mercedes-Benz's 5-speed automatic transmission has a gear for just about every situation, and shifts with smooth authority. Braking is superb: swift and undramatic. Handling is responsive and stable, cornering response flat, though the CLK is not quite as agile as a BMW 3-Series. A firm but mostly comfortable ride lets you feel most bumps, but not really harsh impacts. That benefit is spoiled, however, by thumping over expansion joints and tire rumble on rough pavements. Road roar is noticeable, especially from the rear tires. Wind and mechanical ruckus are well-checked. Both engines emit a pleasing, subdued snarl under hard throttle. Front occupants get decent room, but the feeling is snug rather than spacious. Expect skimpy rear-seat leg room and tight rear-seat entry/exit, at least for adults, despite front seats that power forward after tilting their backrests. The rear seat is configured for two occupants only, and leg space vanishes with the front seat positioned fully aft. Front head room is just adequate for 6-footers, and head space in back is scant except for preteens. Cargo space isn't great either. The wheel only telescopes (no tilt), and several switches are poorly marked or placed. Over-the-shoulder views are not the best, but visibility is generally good. Controls are handy and user-friendly, once you've deciphered a few markings. Cabin decor is more clinical than cushy, not uncommon for Mercedes, though workmanship is generally fine inside and out. Mercedes-Benz took great pains to make its convertible solid, and succeeded admirably.
Value for the Money
A comfortable and capable tourer, CLK offers Mercedes prestige and greater refinement, plus style and poise, for about the same money as Volvo's C70 coupe. High resale value has always been a "plus" for any Mercedes, though that makes secondhand prices high, too.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category |
Mercedes-Benz CLK320 Rating |
|
Performance |
7 |
|
Fuel Economy |
5 |
|
Ride Quality |
6 |
|
Steering/Handling/Braking |
6 |
|
Quietness |
6 |
|
Controls/Materials |
5 |
|
Interior Room |
5 |
|
Room/Comfort (rear) |
2 |
|
Cargo Capacity |
2 |
|
Value within Class |
3 |
| Total Score: |
47 |
|
Each vehicle report contains one rating chart for representative model. Consumer
Guide® rates in ten key areas: Performance, Fuel Economy, Ride Comfort, Steering
and Handling, Interior Noise, Controls and Materials, Driver Room, Passenger Room,
Cargo Capacity, and Insurance Costs. These ratings compare the particular vehicle
rated to ALL other vehicles, not a vehicle's standing in a particular class. In the
ratings table, "1" is the lowest rating and "10" is the highest rating.