1997-2004 Buick Regal: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Buick Regal
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Acceleration
- Automatic-transmission performance
- Passenger and cargo room
- Ride
Cons
- Fuel economy (supercharged engine)
Vehicle Highlights
Buick launched a redesigned version of its midlevel sedan during the 1997 model year, to replace the slightly smaller Regals that had debuted back in '88. Though sharing its underskin structure and basic interior with the Century, Regal was marketed as a sportier sedan, with more-powerful engines. Structurally, the Regal also is related to the Oldsmobile Intrigue and Pontiac Grand Prix. Both the base LS and more-costly GS got a 3.8-liter V6 engine and automatic transmission. Under GS hoods, however, the V6 was supercharged, producing 240 horsepower, in contrast to the usual 195. The Regal GS also got a firmer suspension, a body-colored grille, and leather upholstery. Both models were equipped with front bucket seats and a console-mounted floor shifter. Standard fittings included separate climate controls for the driver and front passenger, magnetic variable-assist power steering, and antilock 4-wheel disc brakes.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Buick Regal LS Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 6 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 6 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 6 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 5 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 52 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1997-2004 Buick Regal includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1997-2004 Buick Regal and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1997-2004 Buick Regal is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Regal fails to match the overall refinement or proven reliability record of a Honda Accord or Toyota Camry, and prices are likely to be far higher than for a comparable Ford Taurus or Mercury Sable. Still, Regal's solidity, performance, and ample quantity of equipment make it worth a close look in the midsize family sedan league.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Buick Regal LS Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 6 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 6 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 6 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 5 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 52 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $380 |
| Alternator | $240 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $980 |
| Brakes | $520 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $1,100 |
| Exhaust System | $470 |
| Radiator | $440 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $1,500 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $315 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2004 | |||
| Regal GS | $9,400-10,700 | $8,500-9,600 | $4,900-5,600 |
| Regal LS | $8,300-9,500 | $7,500-8,600 | $4,300-4,900 |
| 2003 | |||
| Regal GS | $7,800-8,800 | $7,000-7,900 | $4,000-4,500 |
| Regal LS | $6,800-7,600 | $6,100-6,800 | $3,200-3,600 |
| 2002 | |||
| Regal GS | $6,400-7,200 | $5,600-6,300 | $2,800-3,200 |
| Regal LS | $5,600-6,300 | $4,800-5,400 | $2,300-2,600 |
| 2001 | |||
| Regal GS | $5,300-6,000 | $4,600-5,200 | $2,200-2,500 |
| Regal LS | $4,800-5,400 | $4,000-4,500 | $1,800-2,100 |
| 2000 | |||
| Regal GS | $4,700-5,200 | $3,900-4,400 | $1,800-2,000 |
| Regal LS | $4,200-4,800 | $3,400-3,900 | $1,400-1,600 |
| 1999 | |||
| Regal GS | $4,100-4,700 | $3,400-3,900 | $1,400-1,600 |
| Regal LS | $3,600-4,200 | $2,900-3,400 | $1,000-1,200 |
| 1998 | |||
| Regal GS | $3,600-4,100 | $2,900-3,300 | $1,000-1,100 |
| Regal LS | $3,200-3,700 | $2,500-2,900 | $800-900 |
| 1997 | |||
| Regal GS | $3,200-3,700 | $2,500-2,900 | $800-900 |
| Regal LS | $2,800-3,300 | $2,100-2,500 | $600-700 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door sedan | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 109.0 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 196.2 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 72.7 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 56.6 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3447 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 16.7 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 17.0 | |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 39.3 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 42.4 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 31.4 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 36.9 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| Supercharged ohv V6 | 3.8 / 231 | 240 | 280 | 4-speed automatic: 17/27 | 4-speed automatic: 17.6 |
| ohv V6 | 3.8 / 231 | 195-200 | 220 | 4-speed automatic: 19/30 | 4-speed automatic: -- |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1999 Regal |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 4 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 3 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








