1997-2002 Saturn Coupe: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Saturn S-Series
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Fuel economy
- Acceleration (SC2)
Cons
- Entry/exit
- Rear-seat room
- Noise
- Acceleration (SC1 w/auto)
Vehicle Highlights
Redesigned for 1997, the front-drive sports coupe featured new styling on a longer wheelbase. Basic construction continued as before, following Saturn's practice of installing dent- and rust-resistant polymer vertical body panels, mounted on a spaceframe. Two models again went on sale, but the SC1 and SC2 now displayed the same styling. Among the modest differences in this generation, the SC1 got black outside mirrors and door handles, whereas those items on the SC2 were body colored. Fog lamps were standard on the SC2 coupe. Both coupes had standard Daytime Running Lights. Wheelbase was now 102.4 inches, identical to the Saturn sedan and station wagon, which had been redesigned a year earlier. Prior coupes rode a 99.2-inch span. Rear leg room grew by a whopping 4.5 inches. Front and rear head room gained about an inch. Dashboard designs remained essentially as before. Powertrains also continued from the 1991-96 generation. The SC1 held a 100-horsepower, 1.9-liter 4-cylinder engine. A dual-overhead-cam version, rated 124 horsepower, went into the SC2 coupe. Both models had a standard 5-speed manual transmission, with 4-speed automatic optional. Antilock braking was optional, and included traction control.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Saturn SC2 Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4 | |
| Fuel Economy | 6 | |
| Ride Quality | 3 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 4 | |
| Quietness | 3 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 2 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 2 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 37 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1997-2002 Saturn Coupe includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1997-2002 Saturn Coupe and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1997-2002 Saturn Coupe is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
All told, Saturns lack the refinement of most Japanese sports coupes. They're also noisier, but boast an impressive reliability record. The side-curtain airbags added for 2001 are unique in this class.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Saturn SC2 Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4 | |
| Fuel Economy | 6 | |
| Ride Quality | 3 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 4 | |
| Quietness | 3 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 2 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 2 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 37 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $400 |
| Alternator | $350 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $915 |
| Brakes | $190 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $530 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $390 |
| Exhaust System | $310 |
| Radiator | $350 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $490 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $300 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2002 | |||
| SC1 3-door | $4,200-4,800 | $3,400-3,900 | $1,400-1,600 |
| SC2 3-door | $4,900-5,500 | $4,200-4,700 | $1,900-2,100 |
| 2001 | |||
| SC1 3-door | $3,600-4,200 | $2,900-3,400 | $1,000-1,200 |
| SC2 3-door | $4,100-4,700 | $3,400-3,900 | $1,400-1,600 |
| 2000 | |||
| SC1 3-door | $3,100-3,600 | $2,400-2,800 | $700-900 |
| SC2 3-door | $3,400-4,000 | $2,700-3,200 | $900-1,000 |
| 1999 | |||
| SC1 | $2,800-3,300 | $2,100-2,500 | $600-700 |
| SC2 | $3,100-3,600 | $2,400-2,800 | $700-900 |
| 1998 | |||
| SC1 | $2,500-3,000 | $1,800-2,200 | $500-600 |
| SC2 | $2,800-3,300 | $2,100-2,500 | $600-700 |
| 1997 | |||
| SC1 | $2,300-2,800 | $1,700-2,000 | $400-500 |
| SC2 | $2,500-3,000 | $1,800-2,200 | $500-600 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 2-door coupe | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 102.4 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 180.0 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 67.3 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 52.4 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 2308 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 11.4 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 12.1 | |
| Seating Capacity | 4 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 38.5 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 42.6 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 35.7 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 31.0 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| dohc I4 | 1.9 / 116 | 124 | 122 | 5-speed manual: 26/36 4-speed automatic: 24/34 |
5-speed manual: 26 4-speed automatic: -- |
| ohc I4 | 1.9 / 116 | 100 | 114 | 5-speed manual: 28/39 4-speed automatic: 27/37 |
5-speed manual: 31.9 4-speed automatic: -- |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
Vehicle crash test information not available at this time.The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








