1997-2001 Honda CR-V: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Honda CR-V
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Entry/exit
- Passenger and cargo room
Cons
- Acceleration
- Rear-seat comfort
Vehicle Highlights
Whereas most SUVs use truck-type body-on-frame construction with a solid rear axle, the CR-V employed carlike unibody construction and a 4-wheel independent suspension. At 103.1 inches, the CR-V wheelbase was 8.2 inches longer than that of the similar 4-door Toyota RAV4, but 8.4 inches shorter than the span of a 4-door Ford Explorer. Overall length, at 176.4 inches, was 14.4 inches longer than the RAV4 but 12.1 inches shorter than the Explorer. A side-opening tailgate and externally mounted spare tire were installed. Beneath the hood was a dual-overhead-cam 2.0-liter 4-cylinder engine, rated at 126 horsepower and driving a 4-speed automatic transmission. Honda called its standard 4-wheel-drive system "Real-Time 4WD." Most engine power normally went to the front wheels, but a portion could be distributed to the back wheels when sensors indicated that the front tires were losing traction. No low-range gearing was installed. Seating for five and dual airbags were standard. Mounting the gear selector on the steering column instead of the floor permitted a narrow access path between the front seats.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Honda CR-V w/auto Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 3 | |
| Fuel Economy | 6 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 4 | |
| Quietness | 3 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 7 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 45 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1997-2001 Honda CR-V includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1997-2001 Honda CR-V and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1997-2001 Honda CR-V is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Except for a lack of power, the CR-V almost approaches perfection. As it stands, this is a handy and well-built compact wagon with carlike manners and a 4WD system that never needs to be thought about. Even though it can't match the space or brawn of bigger SUVs, Honda's CR-V is clearly the nicest of the "baby-size" 4x4s.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Honda CR-V w/auto Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 3 | |
| Fuel Economy | 6 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 4 | |
| Quietness | 3 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 7 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 45 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $705 |
| Alternator | $600 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $1,265 |
| Brakes | $280 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $840 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $930 |
| Exhaust System | $415 |
| Radiator | $495 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $940 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $545 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2001 | |||
| CR-V 2WD | $6,400-7,300 | $5,600-6,400 | $2,800-3,200 |
| CR-V 4WD | $7,100-8,500 | $6,300-7,600 | $3,400-4,100 |
| 2000 | |||
| CR-V 2WD | $5,500-6,300 | $4,700-5,400 | $2,300-2,600 |
| CR-V 4WD | $6,200-7,500 | $5,400-6,500 | $2,700-3,200 |
| 1999 | |||
| CR-V 2WD | $4,800-5,600 | $4,000-4,700 | $1,800-2,100 |
| CR-V 4WD | $5,400-6,300 | $4,600-5,400 | $2,200-2,600 |
| 1998 | |||
| CR-V 2WD | $4,200-4,900 | $3,400-4,000 | $1,400-1,700 |
| CR-V 4WD | $4,600-5,500 | $3,900-4,600 | $1,700-2,000 |
| 1997 | |||
| CR-V 4WD | $4,000-4,700 | $3,300-3,900 | $1,300-1,500 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door wagon | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 103.1 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 176.4 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 68.9 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 65.9 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3150 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 34.3 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 15.3 | |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 40.5 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 41.5 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 39.2 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 36.7 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| dohc I4 | 2.0 / 122 | 126-146 | 126-133 | 5-speed manual: 22/25 4-speed automatic: 22/25 |
5-speed manual: 20.5 4-speed automatic: 19.2 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1999 CR-V |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 4 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 5 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








