1997-1999 Acura CL: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Pros
- Ride
- Steering/handling
- Acceleration (3.0CL)
Cons
- Automatic-transmission performance
- Acceleration (4-cylinder w/automatic)
Vehicle Highlights
American Honda's luxury division introduced a 4-cylinder 2-door midsize coupe in spring 1996, as an early '97 model. Dubbed 2.2CL, it was the first Acura model to be designed and built in the United States. Also used in the latest Honda Accord, its 2.2-liter 4-cylinder engine developed 145 horsepower. A companion 3.0CL, powered by a new 200-horsepower 3.0-liter V6 engine, arrived in fall 1997. Assembled at Honda's plant in Ohio, along with the smaller Honda Civic, the CL was based on the same front-drive design as Honda's Accord. Styling and interior features differ, however. In size and price, the CL was slotted between Acura's Integra and TL. Both engines were produced in Ohio. Each used a single overhead camshaft, with four valves per cylinder and Honda's VTEC (variable valve timing) design. A 5-speed manual transmission was standard on the 2.2CL. A 4-speed automatic transmission was standard on the 3.0CL, and optional on the 2.2CL.Dual airbags and antilock 4-wheel disc brakes were standard on both versions of the CL. A standard keyless entry system eliminated the need for an exterior trunk lock. Leather upholstery was included in an optional Premium Package.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Acura 3.0CL w/auto Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 6 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 2 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 2 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 45 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1997-1999 Acura CL includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1997-1999 Acura CL and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1997-1999 Acura CL is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
All told, this is a competent, pleasant, and well-constructed coupe, marred only by unsatisfying operation of the automatic transmission. However, most of the CL's virtues are also available in the appealing but less-costly Honda Accord. That's no surprise, since the cars share a number of components.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Acura 3.0CL w/auto Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 6 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 2 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 2 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 45 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $775 |
| Alternator | $365 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $950 |
| Brakes | $190 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $715 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $855 |
| Exhaust System | $360 |
| Radiator | $515 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $430 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $235 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1999 | |||
| 2.3CL | $4,300-5,000 | $3,600-4,200 | $1,500-1,700 |
| 3.0CL | $4,800-5,400 | $4,000-4,500 | $1,800-2,100 |
| 1998 | |||
| 2.3CL | $3,400-3,900 | $2,700-3,100 | $900-1,000 |
| 3.0CL | $3,900-4,500 | $3,200-3,700 | $1,200-1,400 |
| 1997 | |||
| 2.2CL | $2,700-3,200 | $2,000-2,400 | $600-700 |
| 3.0CL | $3,100-3,700 | $2,400-2,900 | $700-900 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 2-door coupe | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 106.5 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 190.0 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 70.1 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 54.7 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3009 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 12.0 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 17.1 | |
| Seating Capacity | 4 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 37.4 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 42.9 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 35.9 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 31.0 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohc I4 | 2.3 / 137 | 150 | 152 | 5-speed manual: 25/31 4-speed automatic: 23/29 |
5-speed manual: -- 4-speed automatic: -- |
| ohc I4 | 2.2 / 132 | 145 | 147 | 5-speed manual: 25/31 4-speed automatic: 23/29 |
5-speed manual: 22.2 4-speed automatic: -- |
| ohc V6 | 3.0 / 183 | 200 | 195 | 4-speed automatic: 20/28 | 4-speed automatic: 22.3 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
Vehicle crash test information not available at this time.The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








