Our road test for the 1997-1999 Acura CL includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the
1997-1999 Acura CL and highlighted the vehicle's performance
with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation
1997-1999 Acura CL is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Styling is unique; but inside, the CL coupe looks, feels, and behaves like a more robust, better-appointed Accord. Also like the Accord, handling is poised and sporty, while the ride is firm but comfortably absorbent. Because of its bigger tires, however, the CL does feel more athletic than an Accord. Both CL engines run smoothly, but the 4-cylinder version performs best with manual shift. With an automatic transmission, it loses energy. A 2.2CL with the 5-speed accelerated to 60 mph in 9.5 seconds--passable, but no powerhouse. Gas mileage was a bonus, however, averaging an impressive 22.2 mpg overall. The 2.3-liter engine installed in 1998 is about as quick and efficient as the initial 2.2-liter. With automatic, acceleration ranks only as adequate. In contrast, the 3.0-liter V6 delivers brisk acceleration. Unfortunately, with either engine the automatic transmission tends to shift with a bothersome jolt when pushing hard on the gas. In addition, the transmission sometimes seems almost confused about which gear to be in during stop-and-go driving. Four adults sit in reasonable comfort, which is a bonus for a sporty coupe. Of course, the interior is typical Acura/Honda, which means a comfortable driving position, unobstructed visibility, and simple, convenient instruments and controls. The power driver's seat in a 3.0CL automatically moves fore and aft to ease rear entry/exit, and it can sense obstructions and reverse direction as needed. Cargo space ranks as more than adequate, but there's only a pass-through opening to the trunk, not a folding rear seatback. Workmanship is top-notch, as expected from Honda's premium brand. This coupe feels robust even on rough roads and displays good detail finish.
Value for the Money
All told, this is a competent, pleasant, and well-constructed coupe, marred only by unsatisfying operation of the automatic transmission. However, most of the CL's virtues are also available in the appealing but less-costly Honda Accord. That's no surprise, since the cars share a number of components.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category |
Acura 3.0CL w/auto Rating |
|
Performance |
5 |
|
Fuel Economy |
5 |
|
Ride Quality |
5 |
|
Steering/Handling/Braking |
5 |
|
Quietness |
6 |
|
Controls/Materials |
6 |
|
Interior Room |
4 |
|
Room/Comfort (rear) |
2 |
|
Cargo Capacity |
2 |
|
Value within Class |
5 |
| Total Score: |
45 |
|
Each vehicle report contains one rating chart for representative model. Consumer
Guide® rates in ten key areas: Performance, Fuel Economy, Ride Comfort, Steering
and Handling, Interior Noise, Controls and Materials, Driver Room, Passenger Room,
Cargo Capacity, and Insurance Costs. These ratings compare the particular vehicle
rated to ALL other vehicles, not a vehicle's standing in a particular class. In the
ratings table, "1" is the lowest rating and "10" is the highest rating.