Our road test for the 1996-2000 Toyota RAV4 includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the
1996-2000 Toyota RAV4 and highlighted the vehicle's performance
with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation
1996-2000 Toyota RAV4 is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
The RAV4 delivers a softer, more-compliant ride as well as more-responsive steering than truck-based SUVs. Unlike the Sidekick/Tracker, which often feels ready to lean over, the RAV4 feels stable and carlike while cornering swiftly, and robust when traversing rough roads. Its permanent 4-wheel-drive system is more convenient than the on-demand systems used by the early competition. Still, you can expect some choppiness on scalloped freeways and over patchy pavement, especially with the shorter-length 2-door model. Tire roar is always noticeable, and wind rush rises sharply as speed increases. The engine becomes quite boomy when worked hard, too. RAV4 also lags behind most small cars in terms of performance. A manual-shift 4WD 2-door accelerated to 60 mph in 10.5 seconds, but an automatic 4-door needed about 13 seconds--and that was without a load. We've averaged a disappointing 20.8 mpg from an automatic 4WD 4-door in city/highway driving. The lighter-weight front-drive models should be a little thriftier, and also quicker. Four adults fit comfortably inside a 4-door RAV, but back-seaters don't get much leg or knee room. Rear entry/exit is a squeeze for larger folks, too. The 2-door is best enjoyed with two adults up front and two children in back, because its rear seat is even tighter than the 4-door's. Rear access also is more difficult, despite a slide-forward feature on the right-front seat. Cargo space is good in both body styles, considering their exterior dimensions. Though not as commanding as in some SUVs, the driving stance allows clear views all around, in either hardtop body style. In the recent convertible, however, the over-the-shoulder view is impaired when the rear roof is in place. On the plus side, the convertible's top fits well, though it takes a while to raise or lower. Most people are likely to be satisfied inside, though more rearward seat travel would be nice--especially for taller folks. The carlike dashboard is simple and convenient.
Value for the Money
Despite the RAV4's pluses, Honda's CR-V is roomier, quieter, and more practical--a better compact wagon and miniSUV than Toyota's offering.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category |
Toyota RAV4 4-door w/auto Rating |
|
Performance |
3 |
|
Fuel Economy |
4 |
|
Ride Quality |
3 |
|
Steering/Handling/Braking |
4 |
|
Quietness |
3 |
|
Controls/Materials |
5 |
|
Interior Room |
4 |
|
Room/Comfort (rear) |
3 |
|
Cargo Capacity |
5 |
|
Value within Class |
5 |
| Total Score: |
39 |
|
Each vehicle report contains one rating chart for representative model. Consumer
Guide® rates in ten key areas: Performance, Fuel Economy, Ride Comfort, Steering
and Handling, Interior Noise, Controls and Materials, Driver Room, Passenger Room,
Cargo Capacity, and Insurance Costs. These ratings compare the particular vehicle
rated to ALL other vehicles, not a vehicle's standing in a particular class. In the
ratings table, "1" is the lowest rating and "10" is the highest rating.