1996-1999 Isuzu Oasis: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Isuzu Oasis
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Fuel economy
- Build quality
- Ride
- Steering/handling
- Entry/exit
Cons
- Engine noise
- Road noise
Vehicle Highlights
Basically a clone of the Honda Odyssey, which went on sale in the U.S. in 1995, the Oasis was built in Japan by Honda. Both models differed from the minivan pack by featuring four conventional swing-open side doors. Oasis used the same 140-horsepower, 2.2-liter 4-cylinder engine as the Odyssey, driving a 4-speed automatic transmission. Dual airbags and all-disc antilock braking were standard. The base S model seated seven with two front buckets, a 3-place middle bench, and a 2-place rear bench. An LS Oasis seated six, replacing the middle bench with two bucket-type captain's chairs. On both models, the middle seats could be removed. The 2-place back seat folded flush into the floor for additional cargo space.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Isuzu Oasis Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 3 | |
| Fuel Economy | 4 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 3 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 5 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 7 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 47 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1996-1999 Isuzu Oasis includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1996-1999 Isuzu Oasis and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1996-1999 Isuzu Oasis is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
If you don't need the greater interior space of a bigger minivan, or if you prefer swing-out rear doors to sliding side doors, an Oasis (or the nearly identical Honda Odyssey) can be a good choice.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Isuzu Oasis Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 3 | |
| Fuel Economy | 4 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 3 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 5 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 7 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 47 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $565 |
| Alternator | $280 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $1,095 |
| Brakes | $230 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $550 |
| Exhaust System | $365 |
| Radiator | $430 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $440 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $330 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1999 | |||
| Oasis | $3,300-4,100 | $2,600-3,200 | $800-1,000 |
| 1998 | |||
| Oasis | $2,600-3,400 | $1,900-2,500 | $500-700 |
| 1997 | |||
| Oasis | $2,000-2,700 | $1,400-1,900 | $300-500 |
| 1996 | |||
| Oasis | $1,600-2,300 | $1,100-1,500 | $200-300 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door wagon | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 111.4 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 187.2 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 70.6 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 64.6 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3473 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 102.5 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 17.2 | |
| Seating Capacity | 71 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 40.1 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 40.7 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 39.3 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 40.2 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohc I4 | 2.2 / 132 | 140 | 145 | 4-speed automatic: 21/26 | 4-speed automatic: 21.8 |
| dohc I4 | 2.3 / 137 | 150 | 152 | 4-speed automatic: 21/26 | 4-speed automatic: 20.6 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1997 Oasis |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 4 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 4 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








