1996-1999 Infiniti I30: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Infiniti I-Series
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Antilock brakes
- Acceleration
- Steering/handling
Cons
- Rear-seat comfort
- Fuel economy
- Rear visibility
Vehicle Highlights
Nissan's luxury division introduced this new sedan as an early '96 model. The front-drive 4-door I30 was based on the design used for the Nissan Maxima. Both rode a 106.3-inch wheelbase. At 189.6 inches overall, the I30 was two inches longer than a Maxima. Exterior styling was the foremost difference between the two, with the I30 wearing a more formal-looking body. Both the I30 and Maxima used the same 190-horsepower, 3.0-liter V6 engine with dual camshafts. A 5-speed manual transmission was standard and 4-speed automatic optional. Suspensions, components, and interiors also were shared. Standard I30 features included dual airbags and antilock brakes.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Infiniti I30t auto Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 6 | |
| Fuel Economy | 4 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 6 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 52 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1996-1999 Infiniti I30 includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1996-1999 Infiniti I30 and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1996-1999 Infiniti I30 is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
With more standard features than a Maxima, the I30 is well-equipped and a good alternative to the more expensive Lexus ES 300--a superior road car for long trips.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Infiniti I30t auto Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 6 | |
| Fuel Economy | 4 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 6 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 52 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $800 |
| Alternator | $410 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $920 |
| Brakes | $210 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $650 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $1,150 |
| Exhaust System | $445 |
| Radiator | $475 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $1,140 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $690 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1999 | |||
| I30 | $5,100-5,800 | $4,300-4,900 | $2,000-2,300 |
| 1998 | |||
| I30 | $4,300-5,000 | $3,600-4,200 | $1,500-1,700 |
| 1997 | |||
| I30 | $3,600-4,300 | $2,900-3,400 | $1,000-1,200 |
| 1996 | |||
| I30 | $3,000-3,700 | $2,300-2,800 | $700-900 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door sedan | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 106.3 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 189.6 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 69.7 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 55.7 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3001 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 14.1 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 18.5 | |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 40.1 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 43.9 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 37.4 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 34.3 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| dohc V6 | 3.0 / 181 | 190 | 205 | 5-speed manual: 21/26 4-speed automatic: 21/28 |
5-speed manual: 22.3 4-speed automatic: 17.3 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1999 I30 |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 4 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 3 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








