1996-1998 Acura TL: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Pros
- Antilock brakes
- Visibility
- Acceleration (3.2TL)
- Instruments/controls
- Steering/handling
Cons
- Road noise (3.2TL)
- Engine noise (2.5TL)
- Automatic-transmission performance
- Rear-seat room
Vehicle Highlights
Redesigning of the in-between sedan (previously called Vigor) from Honda's luxury division brought slightly larger dimensions and also something new: an available V6 engine. At 191.5 inches overall, the TL fits right in between the older Vigor and the Legend sedan. Dual airbags were standard, along with antilock brakes, automatic climate control, cassette and CD players, and power windows and door locks. Leather seating was standard in the more costly 3.2TL with its V6 engine and optional in the five-cylinder 2.5TL. A firmer suspension went into the 2.5TL, which was marketed as the sportier of the two. The 2.5TL went on sale in spring of 1995, but the 3.2TL was delayed until fall of that year, due to a trade dispute with Japan.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Acura TL Type-S Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 7 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 6 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 7 | |
| Quietness | 7 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 7 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 5 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 8 | |
| Total Score: | 61 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1996-1998 Acura TL includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1996-1998 Acura TL and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1996-1998 Acura TL is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Although these TL sedans are well-constructed, pleasant, and better than the previous Vigor in every way, they still fail to overshadow the competition in the midluxury league.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Acura TL Type-S Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 7 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 6 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 7 | |
| Quietness | 7 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 7 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 5 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 8 | |
| Total Score: | 61 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $725 |
| Alternator | $395 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $1,270 |
| Brakes | $215 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $1,010 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $810 |
| Exhaust System | $610 |
| Radiator | $445 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $995 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $230 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1998 | |||
| 2.5TL | $4,000-4,800 | $3,300-3,900 | $1,300-1,500 |
| 3.2TL | $4,600-5,300 | $3,900-4,500 | $1,700-2,000 |
| 1997 | |||
| 2.5TL | $3,200-3,900 | $2,500-3,000 | $800-1,000 |
| 3.2TL | $3,800-4,500 | $3,100-3,700 | $1,200-1,400 |
| 1996 | |||
| 2.5TL | $2,600-3,200 | $1,900-2,400 | $500-700 |
| 3.2TL | $3,100-3,700 | $2,400-2,900 | $700-900 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door sedan | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 111.8 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 191.5 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 70.3 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 55.3 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3252 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 14.1 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 17.2 | |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 39.1 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 43.7 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 36.9 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 35.2 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohc V6 | 3.2 / 196 | 200 | 210 | 4-speed automatic: 19/24 | 4-speed automatic: 18.3 |
| ohc I5 | 2.5 / 152 | 176 | 170 | 4-speed automatic: 20/25 | 4-speed automatic: 19.2 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1998 TL |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 4 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 4 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








