1995-2005 Chevrolet Cavalier: Road Test

An improved suspension, lengthened wheelbase, and stiffer structure combine to furnish a comfortable ride that absorbs most bumps easily, without floating or wallowing on wavy surfaces. Base and LS models lean considerably in turns, however, and respond lazily to quick steering changes. For tight control, look into the Z24, which also rides quite well on most pavement surfaces. Early model base-engine acceleration is adequate with either transmission, but the engine feels coarse under hard throttle. Fortunately, that engine noise settles down to a peaceful level at cruising speed. The 2.4-liter Twin Cam unit is a better match to the automatic transmission than are some rival dual-cam engines because it produces slightly more torque over a broader range of engine speeds. Improved 2.2-liter 4-cylinder in '02 was smoother and most responsive engine yet. As for economy, we averaged 23.8 mpg with a base Cavalier sedan with the automatic transmission. We'd expect more than 30 mpg on the highway. The new 2.2-liter engine rates 1 mpg higher than the 2.4 in EPA fuel-economy estimates. Wind and road noise are moderate. Gauges are clear and controls easy to reach and use, in a well-designed dashboard. Visibility is good to all angles. Six-footers have adequate room in front, though seats lack lower-back support. Rear leg room is okay, but head room suffices only for shorter folks. Getting in and out of the rear on 2-doors is tough. Trunk space is ample, but a small opening makes it difficult to load bulky items. A one-piece folding rear seatback is standard.

Value for the Money
Compared with its most natural rival, the sportier-natured Dodge/Plymouth Neon, the refined Cavalier puts comfort and utility ahead of performance and style. All told, however, it doesn't match the refinement of the Toyota Corolla. For a reasonable sum, however, you get a car with dual airbags and antilock braking, even if it isn't quite as much fun to drive as a Neon.