1995-2001 Suzuki Swift: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Suzuki Esteem/Swift
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Fuel economy
- Optional antilock brakes
- Maneuverability
Cons
- Rear-seat room
- Ride
Vehicle Highlights
Dual airbags and optional antilock brakes highlighted the redesigned front-drive Swift, as well as the similar Geo Metro. A 2-door hatchback body style returned, now on a longer (93.1-inch) wheelbase. The new Swift measured two inches longer overall, and weighed about 75 pounds more. A 1.3-liter 4-cylinder engine that made 70 horsepower returned as the sole engine. A 5-speed manual gearbox was standard; 3-speed automatic transmission optional.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Suzuki Swift auto Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 2 | |
| Fuel Economy | 8 | |
| Ride Quality | 3 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 2 | |
| Quietness | 2 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 2 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 4 | |
| Total Score: | 34 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1995-2001 Suzuki Swift includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1995-2001 Suzuki Swift and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1995-2001 Suzuki Swift is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
If low price is your top priority, a Swift (and its Metro counterpart) are worth considering. Even so, a larger, more substantial car could be a better bet in the end.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Suzuki Swift auto Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 2 | |
| Fuel Economy | 8 | |
| Ride Quality | 3 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 2 | |
| Quietness | 2 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 2 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 4 | |
| Total Score: | 34 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $540 |
| Alternator | $400 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $760 |
| Brakes | $200 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $440 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $700 |
| Exhaust System | $135 |
| Radiator | $335 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $660 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $210 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2001 | |||
| Swift | $2,200-2,800 | $1,600-2,000 | $400-500 |
| 2000 | |||
| Swift | $2,000-2,500 | $1,400-1,800 | $300-400 |
| 1999 | |||
| Swift | $1,800-2,200 | $1,200-1,500 | $300 |
| 1998 | |||
| Swift | $1,600-2,000 | $1,100-1,300 | $200-300 |
| 1997 | |||
| Swift | $1,400-1,800 | $900-1,200 | $200 |
| 1996 | |||
| Swift | $1,300-1,700 | $800-1,100 | $200 |
| 1995 | |||
| Swift | $1,200-1,600 | $700-1,000 | $100-200 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 2-door hatchback | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 93.1 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 149.4 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 62.6 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 54.7 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 1878 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 21.9 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 10.6 | |
| Seating Capacity | 4 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 39.1 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 42.5 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 36.0 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 32.8 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohc I4 | 1.3 / 79 | 79 | 75 | 5-speed manual: 39/43 3-speed automatic: 30/34 |
5-speed manual: -- 3-speed automatic: -- |
| ohc I4 | 1.3 / 79 | 70 | 74 | 5-speed manual: 39/43 4-speed automatic: 30/34 |
5-speed manual: 38.6 4-speed automatic: -- |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
Vehicle crash test information not available at this time.The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








