1995-2001 Geo/Chevrolet Metro: Road Test

Metro's light weight remains evident in the way it drives. Bumps jar the suspension and create kickback through the steering wheel. On the plus side, the Metro is more composed on the road than before. A switch to 13-inch tires (from the former 12-inchers) helps, but cornering grip remains modest, and the Metro suffers plenty of body lean. Only the 4-cylinder/manual-shift combination provides suitable acceleration for both city and highway driving--lively. Step on the gas and the Metro delivers considerable noise, but not so much progress. With an automatic transmission or the 3-cylinder engine, a Metro moves out slowly and requires plenty of room for safe passing. An LSi 4-door with automatic averaged 25.8 miles per gallon, with nearly all city and suburban commuting. That's good, but not really great. Leg room is adequate in front, but getting four adults aboard requires pushing the front seats forward. Head and leg room in the rear are adequate for two. Getting in or out of the back is difficult, on either body style. The rear seat is firm and flat. Controls are easy to see and reach. The dashboard layout is convenient, but the steering wheel sits uncomfortably high and does not adjust. Tall windows and slim roof pillars combine to produce a great view in all directions. Cargo space is generous for the car's size, and the interior offers an airy feeling. Though quieter now, a Metro is still noisy compared to most cars.

Value for the Money
All told, we rank Metro ahead of Ford's Aspire in the minicar field. It's worth a look if price is your top priority.