1995-2000 Lexus LS 400: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Lexus LS
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Acceleration
- Quietness
- Antilock brakes
- Passenger room
- Ride
Cons
- Cargo room
- Price
- Fuel economy
Vehicle Highlights
Shortly after the 1995 model year began, a second generation LS 400 went on sale. Roomier than the 1990 to '94 edition, the new LS 400 also had more engine power as well as fresh styling. Wheelbase was stretched by 1.4 inches, to 112.2, but overall length stayed the same as 196.7 inches. Back-seat passengers gained 2.6 inches in leg room and trunk space grew by half a cubic foot, from 14.4 to 14.9. Still rear-wheel drive, the LS 400 kept its 4.0-liter V8 engine, but horsepower output rose from 250 to 260. Standard equipment included dual airbags and 4-wheel antilock disc brakes.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Lexus LS 400 Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 6 | |
| Fuel Economy | 2 | |
| Ride Quality | 9 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 9 | |
| Controls/Materials | 7 | |
| Interior Room | 8 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 6 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 6 | |
| Total Score: | 62 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1995-2000 Lexus LS 400 includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1995-2000 Lexus LS 400 and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1995-2000 Lexus LS 400 is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Impressive as the original LS 400 turned out to be, the latest rendition is even better. Workmanship? Simply excellent. Refinement? Exceptional. Expensive? Of course. Like many items of true quality, though, an LS 400 is well worth the price.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Lexus LS 400 Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 6 | |
| Fuel Economy | 2 | |
| Ride Quality | 9 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 9 | |
| Controls/Materials | 7 | |
| Interior Room | 8 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 6 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 6 | |
| Total Score: | 62 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $1,135 |
| Alternator | $460 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $1,020 |
| Brakes | $280 |
| Exhaust System | $450 |
| Radiator | $635 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $2,320 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $285 |
| Universal Joints | $1,300 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2000 | |||
| LS 400 | $11,500-13,000 | $10,400-11,700 | $6,300-7,200 |
| 1999 | |||
| LS 400 | $10,000-11,200 | $9,000-10,100 | $5,200-5,800 |
| 1998 | |||
| LS 400 | $8,500-9,500 | $7,700-8,600 | $4,400-4,900 |
| 1997 | |||
| LS 400 | $7,200-8,200 | $6,400-7,300 | $3,500-4,000 |
| 1996 | |||
| LS 400 | $6,000-7,000 | $5,200-6,100 | $2,500-2,900 |
| 1995 | |||
| LS 400 | $5,200-6,000 | $4,400-5,100 | $2,100-2,400 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door sedan | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 112.2 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 196.7 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 72.0 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 56.7 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3650 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 14.9 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 22.5 | |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 38.9 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 43.8 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 36.9 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 36.9 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| dohc V8 | 4.0 / 242 | 260-290 | 270-300 | 4-speed automatic: 19/26 5-speed automatic: 19/25 |
4-speed automatic: 19.5 5-speed automatic: -- |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
Vehicle crash test information not available at this time.The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








