1995-2000 Ford Contour: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Ford Contour
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Steering/handling
- Automatic-transmission performance
- Optional antilock brakes and traction control
- Acceleration (V6)
Cons
- Radio controls
- Engine noise (4-cylinder)
- Rear-seat room
Vehicle Highlights
Ford's latest rival to the Honda Accord and other compact and mid-size sedans replaced the Tempo. Mercury offers a similar 4-door sedan, called Mystique. Both were based on the European Ford Mondeo. Contour came in GL, LX, and sporty SE price levels. Dual airbags were standard. Antilock brakes and traction control (which works at all speeds) were optional on all models. Bumpers that withstand a 5-mph impact are a bonus. Base engine was a 2.0-liter 4-cylinder, producing 125 horsepower. Standard on the SE and optional on the others was a 170-horsepower 2.5-liter V6. Both engines were available with 5-speed manual shift or an optional electronic 4-speed automatic transmission.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Ford Contour SE auto Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4 | |
| Fuel Economy | 6 | |
| Ride Quality | 4 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 4 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 45 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1995-2000 Ford Contour includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1995-2000 Ford Contour and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1995-2000 Ford Contour is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Ford took a huge step forward in performance, refinement, and overall execution with its compact sedan. All told, Contour is a formidable rival to Japanese compacts and to the Chrysler Cirrus and Dodge Stratus.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Ford Contour SE auto Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4 | |
| Fuel Economy | 6 | |
| Ride Quality | 4 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 4 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 45 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $360 |
| Alternator | $455 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $800 |
| Brakes | $290 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $750 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $465 |
| Radiator | $345 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $700 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $345 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $175 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2000 | |||
| Contour | $2,400-3,000 | $1,700-2,200 | $500-600 |
| Contour SVT | $3,200-4,000 | $2,500-3,100 | $800-1,000 |
| 1999 | |||
| Contour | $2,100-2,600 | $1,500-1,800 | $400-500 |
| Contour SE | $2,400-2,900 | $1,700-2,100 | $500-600 |
| Contour SVT | $2,800-3,500 | $2,100-2,600 | $600-800 |
| 1998 | |||
| Contour | $1,800-2,300 | $1,200-1,600 | $300 |
| Contour SE | $2,100-2,600 | $1,500-1,800 | $400-500 |
| Contour SVT | $2,500-3,200 | $1,800-2,300 | $500-700 |
| 1997 | |||
| Contour | $1,600-2,000 | $1,100-1,300 | $200-300 |
| Contour SE | $1,900-2,300 | $1,300-1,600 | $300-400 |
| 1996 | |||
| Contour | $1,400-1,800 | $900-1,200 | $200 |
| Contour SE | $1,600-2,000 | $1,100-1,300 | $200-300 |
| 1995 | |||
| Contour | $1,200-1,600 | $700-1,000 | $100-200 |
| Contour SE | $1,400-1,800 | $900-1,200 | $200 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door sedan | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 106.5 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 183.9 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 69.1 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 54.5 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 2769 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 13.9 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 14.5 | |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 39.0 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 42.4 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 36.7 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 34.3 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| dohc V6 | 2.5 / 155 | 195 | 165 | 5-speed manual: 20/29 | 5-speed manual: 24.3 |
| dohc V6 | 2.5 / 155 | 170 | 165 | 5-speed manual: 21/31 4-speed automatic: 21/30 |
5-speed manual: -- 4-speed automatic: 23 |
| dohc I4 | 2.0 / 121 | 125 | 130 | 5-speed manual: 24/34 4-speed automatic: 23/32 |
5-speed manual: -- 4-speed automatic: 21.7 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1999 Contour |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 5 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 4 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








