1994-2004 GMC Sonoma: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to GMC Sonoma
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Instruments/controls
- Acceleration (V6)
- Optional third door (later models)
- Passenger room
Cons
- Ride (some models)
- Rear-seat room
- Seat comfort (front passenger)
Vehicle Highlights
As in the pre-1994 generation, the redesigned GMC Sonoma and similar Chevrolet S-Series compact pickup shared basic styling. Each rode a modification of the prior generation's platform, with more powerful engines than before and newly available 4-wheel antilock braking. Overall lengths increased by about 10 inches, for all three body styles: regular-cab long- and short-bed, and extended-cab short-bed. A redesigned dashboard and console included two cupholders. Pickups again came with rear-drive or part-time 4-wheel drive, with 4-cylinder or V6 engines and a 6- or 7.5-foot cargo bed. Rear antilock braking was standard on 4-cylinder models; V6s got new 4-wheel ABS that worked in both rear-drive and 4WD.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | GMC Sonoma ext. cab 4WD, auto Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 3 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 3 | |
| Quietness | 3 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 1 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 4 | |
| Total Score: | 36 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1994-2004 GMC Sonoma includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1994-2004 GMC Sonoma and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1994-2004 GMC Sonoma is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
We rate Ford's Ranger a notch above the GMC and Chevrolet compact pickups, due to its slightly more polished feel. Dodge's latest Dakota, as redesigned for 1997, is bigger yet and even more polished, with stronger hauling ability and an available V8 engine. Even so, most buyers will find plenty to like in the GMC/Chevrolet compacts.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | GMC Sonoma ext. cab 4WD, auto Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 3 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 3 | |
| Quietness | 3 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 1 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 4 | |
| Total Score: | 36 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $550 |
| Alternator | $255 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $750 |
| Brakes | $210 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $545 |
| Exhaust System | $450 |
| Radiator | $410 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $345 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $420 |
| Universal Joints | $190 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 2004 | |||
| Sonoma 4WD | $11,400-12,600 | $10,300-11,300 | $6,300-6,900 |
| 2003 | |||
| Sonoma 2WD | $5,400-8,000 | $4,600-6,900 | $2,200-3,300 |
| Sonoma 4WD | $7,800-10,600 | $7,000-9,500 | $4,000-5,400 |
| 2002 | |||
| Sonoma 2WD | $4,700-7,000 | $3,900-5,900 | $1,800-2,700 |
| Sonoma 4WD | $6,900-9,500 | $6,100-8,500 | $3,200-4,500 |
| 2001 | |||
| Sonoma 2WD | $4,100-6,000 | $3,400-4,900 | $1,400-2,000 |
| Sonoma 4WD | $6,000-8,600 | $5,200-7,500 | $2,500-3,600 |
| 2000 | |||
| Sonoma 2WD | $3,700-5,300 | $3,000-4,300 | $1,100-1,500 |
| Sonoma 4WD | $5,100-7,100 | $4,300-6,000 | $2,000-2,800 |
| 1999 | |||
| Sonoma 2WD | $3,200-4,700 | $2,500-3,700 | $800-1,200 |
| Sonoma 4WD | $4,500-6,300 | $3,700-5,200 | $1,600-2,300 |
| 1998 | |||
| Sonoma 2WD | $2,700-4,100 | $2,000-3,100 | $600-900 |
| Sonoma 4WD | $3,900-5,300 | $3,200-4,300 | $1,200-1,600 |
| 1997 | |||
| Sonoma 2WD | $2,200-3,400 | $1,600-2,400 | $400-600 |
| Sonoma 4WD | $3,300-4,600 | $2,600-3,600 | $800-1,200 |
| 1996 | |||
| Sonoma 2WD | $1,900-2,700 | $1,300-1,900 | $300-400 |
| Sonoma 4WD | $2,800-3,900 | $2,100-2,900 | $600-900 |
| 1995 | |||
| Sonoma 2WD | $1,700-2,700 | $1,100-1,800 | $300-400 |
| Sonoma 4WD | $2,400-3,600 | $1,700-2,600 | $500-700 |
| 1994 | |||
| Sonoma 2WD | $1,500-2,200 | $1,000-1,400 | $200-300 |
| Sonoma 4WD | $2,000-2,900 | $1,400-2,000 | $300-500 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | crew cab | ext. cab | reg. cab long bed | reg. cab short bed |
| Wheelbase, in. | 122.9 | 122.9 | 117.9 | 108.3 |
| Overall Length, in. | 205.3 | 203.7 | 205.0 | 189.0 |
| Overall Width, in. | 67.8 | 67.9 | 67.9 | 67.9 |
| Overall Height, in. | 63.4 | 62.2 | 62.1 | 62.1 |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 4039 | 3168 | 2983 | 2930 |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | 1111 | 1461 | 1727 | 1667 |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 18.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| Front Head Room, in. | 39.6 | 39.5 | 39.5 | 39.5 |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 42.4 | 43.2 | 43.2 | 43.2 |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 38.2 | -- | -- | -- |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 34.6 | -- | -- | -- |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohv V6 | 4.3 / 262 | 180-195 | 245-260 | 5-speed manual: 18/25 4-speed automatic: 20/24 |
5-speed manual: -- 4-speed automatic: 18 |
| ohv I4 | 2.2 / 134 | 118-120 | 130-140 | 5-speed manual: 23/30 4-speed automatic: 20/27 |
5-speed manual: 22.3 4-speed automatic: -- |
| ohv V6 | 4.3 / 262 | 155-180 | 235-245 | 5-speed manual: 18/25 4-speed automatic: 19/24 |
5-speed manual: -- 4-speed automatic: 18.4 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1999 Sonoma |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 3 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 3 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








