1992-1997 Buick Skylark: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Buick Skylark
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Antilock brakes
- Acceleration (V6)
- Automatic-transmission performance
Cons
- Noise
- Instrument cluster (early models)
- Rear-seat entry/exit
- Steering/handling (base suspension)
Vehicle Highlights
Buick redesigned its front-drive compact for 1992, with striking "new age" styling. Wheelbase was the same as before, but overall length grew by 9 inches. Oldsmobile's Achieva and Pontiac's Grand Am, on the same platform, look totally different. Base and Gran Sport (GS) editions came in 2- and 4-door sedan body styles. Base models got a Quad OHC 2.3-liter 4-cylinder engine; Gran Sports, a 3.3-liter V6. All Skylarks had antilock brakes, power door locks, and a split folding rear seat. Instead of an airbag, Skylarks had GM's door-mounted front seatbelts, which could be left buckled for automatic deployment.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Buick Skylark GS coupe Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 4 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 4 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 45 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1992-1997 Buick Skylark includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1992-1997 Buick Skylark and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1992-1997 Buick Skylark is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Riding and handling better than prior Skylarks, this more modern Buick can still be a sensible choice, despite loud engines and poor insulation.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Buick Skylark GS coupe Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 4 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 4 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 45 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $540 |
| Alternator | $225 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $1,105 |
| Brakes | $245 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $565 |
| Exhaust System | $450 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $450 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $350 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1997 | |||
| Gran Sport | $2,000-2,400 | $1,400-1,700 | $300-400 |
| Skylark | $1,800-2,300 | $1,200-1,600 | $300 |
| 1996 | |||
| Gran Sport | $1,700-2,100 | $1,100-1,400 | $300 |
| Skylark | $1,500-1,900 | $1,000-1,200 | $200 |
| 1995 | |||
| Gran Sport | $1,500-1,900 | $1,000-1,200 | $200 |
| Skylark | $1,300-1,700 | $800-1,100 | $200 |
| 1994 | |||
| Gran Sport | $1,300-1,700 | $800-1,100 | $200 |
| Skylark | $1,200-1,500 | $700-900 | $100-200 |
| 1993 | |||
| Gran Sport | $1,200-1,500 | $700-900 | $100-200 |
| Skylark | $1,100-1,400 | $700-900 | $100-200 |
| 1992 | |||
| Gran Sport | $1,100-1,400 | $700-900 | $100-200 |
| Skylark | $1,000-1,300 | $600-800 | $100 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 2-door coupe | 4-door sedan |
| Wheelbase, in. | 103.4 | 103.4 |
| Overall Length, in. | 189.1 | 189.1 |
| Overall Width, in. | 68.7 | 68.7 |
| Overall Height, in. | 53.2 | 53.2 |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 2888 | 2941 |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | -- |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 15.2 | 15.2 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Front Head Room, in. | 37.8 | 37.8 |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 43.3 | 43.3 |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 36.5 | 37.0 |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 32.5 | 33.5 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| dohc I4 | 2.3 / 138 | 150 | 145 | 3-speed automatic: 22/30 4-speed automatic: 21/31 |
3-speed automatic: -- 4-speed automatic: -- |
| dohc I4 | 2.4 / 146 | 150 | 150 | 4-speed automatic: 22/32 | 4-speed automatic: -- |
| ohc I4 | 2.3 / 138 | 115-120 | 140 | 3-speed automatic: 22/31 4-speed automatic: 22/31 |
3-speed automatic: -- 4-speed automatic: -- |
| ohv V6 | 3.1 / 191 | 155 | 185 | 4-speed automatic: 21/29 | 4-speed automatic: -- |
| ohv V6 | 3.3 / 204 | 160 | 185 | 3-speed automatic: 19/29 | 3-speed automatic: 20.4 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1997 Skylark |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 5 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 4 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








