1991-1994 Toyota Tercel: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Toyota Tercel
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Fuel economy
- Antilock brakes (optional)
- Maneuverability
Cons
- Road noise
- Engine noise
- Rear-seat room
- Wind noise
Vehicle Highlights
Toyota's smallest front-drive subcompact was redesigned for '91, and returned slightly roomier and more powerful than the car it replaced. A 2-door notchback was offered, but a 4-door sedan took the place of the previous year's 2-door hatchback. Wheelbase remained at 93.7 inches, but the 161.8-inch overall length fell between the prior year's 2-door, which was 4.5 inches longer, and the hatchback, which was five inches shorter. Two-door models came in base and Deluxe trim; the 4-door was offered in Deluxe (DX) and LE form. All used an updated version of the previous 1.5-liter 4-cylinder engine. A 4-speed manual was the only transmission offered on the base model; the others had a 5-speed manual standard and a 3-speed automatic optional.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Toyota Tercel Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 3 | |
| Fuel Economy | 6 | |
| Ride Quality | 3 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 3 | |
| Quietness | 3 | |
| Controls/Materials | 3 | |
| Interior Room | 3 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 4 | |
| Total Score: | 34 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1991-1994 Toyota Tercel includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1991-1994 Toyota Tercel and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1991-1994 Toyota Tercel is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Unfortunately for the Tercel, Toyota dictated that it be the low-price leader in the automaker's very full model lineup, and it shows. The car is simply outclassed by the plusher, more substantial subcompacts against which it must compete.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Toyota Tercel Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 3 | |
| Fuel Economy | 6 | |
| Ride Quality | 3 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 3 | |
| Quietness | 3 | |
| Controls/Materials | 3 | |
| Interior Room | 3 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 4 | |
| Total Score: | 34 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $1,368 |
| Alternator | $355 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $1,010 |
| Brakes | $190 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $460 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $680 |
| Exhaust System | $395 |
| Radiator | $470 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $635 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $210 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1994 | |||
| Tercel | $1,300-1,700 | $800-1,100 | $200 |
| 1993 | |||
| Tercel | $1,200-1,500 | $700-900 | $100-200 |
| 1992 | |||
| Tercel | $1,100-1,400 | $700-900 | $100-200 |
| 1991 | |||
| Tercel | $1,000-1,300 | $600-800 | $100 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 2-door coupe | 4-door sedan |
| Wheelbase, in. | 93.7 | 93.7 |
| Overall Length, in. | 161.8 | 161.9 |
| Overall Width, in. | 64.8 | 64.8 |
| Overall Height, in. | 53.2 | 53.2 |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 1950 | 2005 |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | -- |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 11.9 | 11.9 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Front Head Room, in. | 38.7 | 38.7 |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 41.2 | 41.2 |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 36.7 | 36.1 |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 31.9 | 31.9 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohc I4 | 1.5 / 89 | 82 | 90 | 4-speed manual: 33/37 5-speed manual: 29/35 3-speed automatic: 26/29 |
4-speed manual: -- 5-speed manual: -- 3-speed automatic: 26.3 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1994 Tercel |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 4 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 5 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








