1991-1994 Mazda Navajo: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Mazda Navajo
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Acceleration
- 4WD traction
- Passenger and cargo room
- Antilock brakes
Cons
- Noise
- Ride
- Fuel economy
Vehicle Highlights
Mazda bought Explorers from Ford, then installed their own grille, taillamps, and minor body trim. Only a 2-door wagon was offered, whereas Explorers could also be purchased in 4-door form. Built by Ford, the 155-horsepower 4.0-liter V6 drove either a 5-speed manual gearbox or a 4-speed automatic transmission. All models had Ford's part-time electronic Touch-Drive 4WD system. Rear antilock brakes were standard, operating only in 2-wheel drive. Navajos seated four. A split folding rear seat could be folded down for extra cargo space.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Mazda Navajo automatic Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4 | |
| Fuel Economy | 2 | |
| Ride Quality | 3 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 3 | |
| Quietness | 3 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 6 | |
| Value within Class | 3 | |
| Total Score: | 36 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1991-1994 Mazda Navajo includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1991-1994 Mazda Navajo and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1991-1994 Mazda Navajo is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
All told, this is a modern, competent 4x4 that stacks up well against each of the 1991-94 competitors. Because Ford's Explorer and Mazda's Navajo are so similar in construction and operation, the best choice might be the one with the lowest price.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Mazda Navajo automatic Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4 | |
| Fuel Economy | 2 | |
| Ride Quality | 3 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 3 | |
| Quietness | 3 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 6 | |
| Value within Class | 3 | |
| Total Score: | 36 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $300 |
| Alternator | $290 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $690 |
| Brakes | $340 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $450 |
| Exhaust System | $660 |
| Radiator | $395 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $400 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $200 |
| Universal Joints | $485 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1994 | |||
| Navajo 2WD | $1,400-1,900 | $900-1,200 | $200 |
| Navajo 4WD | $1,800-2,300 | $1,200-1,600 | $300 |
| 1993 | |||
| Navajo 2WD | $1,200-1,600 | $700-1,000 | $100-200 |
| Navajo 4WD | $1,500-1,900 | $1,000-1,200 | $200 |
| 1992 | |||
| Navajo 2WD | $1,000-1,400 | $600-800 | $100 |
| Navajo 4WD | $1,200-1,600 | $700-1,000 | $100-200 |
| 1991 | |||
| Navajo 4WD | $1,200-1,600 | $700-1,000 | $100-200 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 2-door wagon | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 102.1 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 175.3 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 70.2 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 68.1 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3785 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 69.5 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 19.3 | |
| Seating Capacity | 4 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 39.9 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 42.4 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 39.1 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 36.6 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohv V6 | 4.0 / 245 | 155-160 | 220 | 5-speed manual: 17/22 4-speed automatic: 15/20 |
5-speed manual: -- 4-speed automatic: 16.8 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1994 Navajo |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 3 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 4 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








