Our road test for the 1991-1993 Nissan NX includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the
1991-1993 Nissan NX and highlighted the vehicle's performance
with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation
1991-1993 Nissan NX is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Regardless of model, Nissan's NX hatchback coupes offers sporty appearance, sound ergonomics, a driver's airbag, and the promise of frugal fuel economy. Performance, as expected, varies with the engine and transmission. Rivals to the NX 1600 include the Toyota Paseo, as well as base versions of the Geo Storm, Hyundai Scoupe, Mazda MX-3, and Mitsubishi Eclipse/Plymouth Laser. With its stronger engine, the NX 2000 is a close performance match for Honda's Civic del Sol, likely to please enthusiast drivers. Neither NX has much punch below 3500 rpm or so, and even the NX 2000 is taxed with an automatic transmission, demanding a lot of throttle-to-the-floor driving in urban traffic. Though eager to rev, the 2.0-liter sounds "busy" turning 2900 rpm at 60 mph. For decent around-town pickup and safe merging onto fast-moving expressways, especially with the 1600 engine, the easy-shifting manual is a better choice. A stick-shift NX 1600 will whip around town and merge/pass with little drama. Gas mileage is a bonus. We averaged 27.5 mpg in city/highway driving with a new 5-speed NX 2000. Optional antilock braking on that model stopped the coupe with good control. Overall noise levels are high, but handling is as nimble as the car's light weight and small size suggest. Skinnier tires and a softer suspension ensure that the NX 1600 can't match its higher-powered mate's grip in turns, nor in its playful, responsive feel. Ride quality with the NX 1600 is above average for its class, and the NX 2000 doesn't sacrifice an undue amount of comfort to handling prowess. Well-shaped bucket seats embrace the driver, who faces an array of simple gauges and controls. However, the low seating position isn't so great for outward visibility. Even 6-footers have good leg room and adequate head room up front. Like nearly every small sports coupe, the NX rear seat is toddler-tiny. Still, that back seat can be folded to create fine luggage space, though a high rear sill hampers getting to it. Even with its T-top removed, the NX feels solid.
Value for the Money
Not a strong seller, especially in its final seasons, the NX delivers a measure of sporty behavior for relatively few dollars. Best value is the NX 2000, which promises more spirited performance, especially if equipped with antilock braking.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category |
Nissan NX 1600/2000 Rating |
|
Performance |
4 |
|
Fuel Economy |
7 |
|
Ride Quality |
3 |
|
Steering/Handling/Braking |
6 |
|
Quietness |
3 |
|
Controls/Materials |
5 |
|
Interior Room |
4 |
|
Room/Comfort (rear) |
2 |
|
Cargo Capacity |
3 |
|
Value within Class |
5 |
| Total Score: |
42 |
|
Each vehicle report contains one rating chart for representative model. Consumer
Guide® rates in ten key areas: Performance, Fuel Economy, Ride Comfort, Steering
and Handling, Interior Noise, Controls and Materials, Driver Room, Passenger Room,
Cargo Capacity, and Insurance Costs. These ratings compare the particular vehicle
rated to ALL other vehicles, not a vehicle's standing in a particular class. In the
ratings table, "1" is the lowest rating and "10" is the highest rating.