1990-1997 Mercury Cougar: Full Review
Updated: 12/17/09
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Mercury Cougar
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Acceleration (V8)
Cons
- Acceleration (V6)
- Fuel economy
- Visibility
Vehicle Highlights
The Mercury Cougar got a clean-sheet redesign for 1989, and saw no major changes for 1990. As before, the new Cougars differed from the mechanically similar Ford Thunderbird primarily in their formal roofline and Mercury grille. A 140-horsepower, 3.8-liter V6 and 4-speed overdrive automatic came standard in the base LS. For the premium XR7, Mercury added a supercharged and intercooled version of the overhead-valve V6, which delivers 210 horsepower and 315 pound-feet of torque. Both engines were paired with either a 5-speed manual or optional automatic. Four-wheel antilock disc brakes came standard on the XR7, but were optional on the LS.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Mercury Cougar XR7 4.6-liter Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 6 | |
| Fuel Economy | 3 | |
| Ride Quality | 6 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 4 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 2 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 6 | |
| Total Score: | 48 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1990-1997 Mercury Cougar includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1990-1997 Mercury Cougar and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1990-1997 Mercury Cougar is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
All-in-all, Cougar is a solid choice in the coupe market, but its rear-wheel drive and gas-guzzling engines are too big a disadvantage in this hotly contested market segment.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Mercury Cougar XR7 4.6-liter Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 6 | |
| Fuel Economy | 3 | |
| Ride Quality | 6 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 6 | |
| Quietness | 4 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 2 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 6 | |
| Total Score: | 48 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $375 |
| Alternator | $445 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $810 |
| Brakes | $275 |
| Exhaust System | $280 |
| Radiator | $405 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $430 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $340 |
| Universal Joints | $260 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1997 | |||
| Cougar | $2,100-2,600 | $1,500-1,800 | $400-500 |
| 1996 | |||
| Cougar | $1,800-2,200 | $1,200-1,500 | $300 |
| 1995 | |||
| Cougar | $1,600-2,000 | $1,100-1,300 | $200-300 |
| 1994 | |||
| Cougar | $1,400-1,800 | $900-1,200 | $200 |
| 1993 | |||
| Cougar | $1,300-1,700 | $800-1,100 | $200 |
| 1992 | |||
| Cougar | $1,200-1,600 | $700-1,000 | $100-200 |
| 1991 | |||
| Cougar | $1,100-1,400 | $700-900 | $100-200 |
| 1990 | |||
| Cougar | $1,000-1,300 | $600-800 | $100 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 2-door coupe | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 113.0 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 200.3 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 72.7 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 52.5 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3575 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 15.1 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 18.0 | |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 38.1 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 42.5 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 37.5 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 35.8 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohv V6 | 3.8 / 232 | 140-145 | 215 | 4-speed automatic: 19/27 | 4-speed automatic: -- |
| Supercharged ohv V6 | 3.8 / 232 | 210 | 315 | 5-speed manual: 17/24 4-speed automatic: 17/23 |
5-speed manual: -- 4-speed automatic: -- |
| ohv V8 | 5.0 / 302 | 200 | 275 | 4-speed automatic: 17/24 | 4-speed automatic: 15.5 |
| ohc V8 | 4.6 / 281 | 205 | 280 | 4-speed automatic: 17/25 | 4-speed automatic: 18.2 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1997 Cougar |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 5 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 5 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.
NHTSA Recall History
Car Buying Resources
Search
Local Listings

Used Car?
with a CARFAX® Report
Report Package








