Our road test for the 1990-1996 Pontiac Grand Prix includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the
1990-1996 Pontiac Grand Prix and highlighted the vehicle's performance
with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation
1990-1996 Pontiac Grand Prix is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
It's best to avoid models with the noisy 4-cylinder engine. However, the 3.1-liter V6 provides ample acceleration with much less noise and vibration. Turbo engines provide outstanding acceleration, but suffer from "turbo lag" and poor fuel economy. The best engine choice is the dohc 3.4-liter V6, which provides the acceleration of the turbo engine without the lag and ruckus. Inside, the cabin of the 1990-1993 Grand Prix with its backlit red gauge cluster works hard to emulate the continental flair of the BMW. However, Pontiac is not quite able to capture the European maturity or purposefulness. Revisions to the cabin in 1994 bring long overdue improvements. The new controls are both simpler to use and easier to reach. Large, soft-touch rotary dials replace the climate system's fussy, undersized switches and sliders. Select either the coupe or sedan and you should find the cabin capable of transporting four adults in relative pleasure--but the back seat is too low and uncomfortable. Pontiac's suspension tuning gives the Grand Prix somewhat more composed road manners than the Lumina, Regal, and Cutlass Supreme, especially over bumps and dips. Cornering ability is especially impressive on cars equipped with the Y99 rally suspension package, but drivers must endure a harsher ride.
Value for the Money
We rate the Ford Taurus, Mercury Sable, and Honda Accord higher overall. But with the gradual improvements bestowed on the Grand Prix, it is a good choice as well.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category |
Pontiac Grand Prix SE 2-door 3.4-liter Rating |
|
Performance |
7 |
|
Fuel Economy |
3 |
|
Ride Quality |
4 |
|
Steering/Handling/Braking |
6 |
|
Quietness |
5 |
|
Controls/Materials |
5 |
|
Interior Room |
5 |
|
Room/Comfort (rear) |
3 |
|
Cargo Capacity |
3 |
|
Value within Class |
5 |
| Total Score: |
46 |
|
Each vehicle report contains one rating chart for representative model. Consumer
Guide® rates in ten key areas: Performance, Fuel Economy, Ride Comfort, Steering
and Handling, Interior Noise, Controls and Materials, Driver Room, Passenger Room,
Cargo Capacity, and Insurance Costs. These ratings compare the particular vehicle
rated to ALL other vehicles, not a vehicle's standing in a particular class. In the
ratings table, "1" is the lowest rating and "10" is the highest rating.