Our road test for the 1990-1996 Nissan 300ZX includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the
1990-1996 Nissan 300ZX and highlighted the vehicle's performance
with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation
1990-1996 Nissan 300ZX is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
More sports car than luxury model, the 300ZX does not cheat occupants of comforts or conveniences. In any form, though, the 300ZX emphasizes dynamic stability over comfort and practicality. Strong low-end acceleration and prompt, spirited passing response characterize the base model, which can accelerate to 60 mph in 8 seconds or less. With the twin-turbo engine, 0-60 time drops to about 6.2 seconds. An automatic transmission slows down the base car appreciably. Movement off the line is blunted, and only a serious stab at the throttle gets it to downshift for passing. With either transmission, the Turbo simply catapults away from stoplights and springs ahead from virtually any speed. Gas mileage is passable. We averaged 18.7 mpg with an automatic transmission, and a 5-speed Turbo managed 17.1 mpg. Both require premium fuel. A low, wide stance yields balanced, confidence-inspiring grip and handling. All models zip around tight corners with admirable agility, virtually no body lean, and commendable grasp--as long as the pavement is dry, that is. Traction diminishes greatly on wet roads. Rain and snow demand caution because it's easy to break the rear end loose, but antilock-equipped braking ranks as commendable. Sports-car handling produces a penalty in ride comfort. An ally in cornering maneuvers, the stiff suspension fails to absorb most bumps, but simply hammers over them. Rough roads induce little "cowl shake" in the convertible. Strong performance yields a penalty in fuel economy. Expect less than 20 mpg, except in straight highway cruising. Getting in or out of the low-slung cockpit demands some dexterity, and you'll need plenty of room to fully open the wide, heavy doors. Once behind the wheel in the ergonomically correct interior, the driver will appreciate clearly marked gauges and handy controls. Seats are comfortable and supportive, with adequate room for two people to stretch out. On the downside, a low seating position and wide pillars on coupes make it difficult to see directly behind and over the shoulder. The 2+2's back seat is strictly for luggage, and the coupe's cargo bay is shallow and poorly shaped.
Value for the Money
For performance and image above all else, the well-assembled 300ZX is a fine choice--but at a high cost. Then again, its principal rivals--the Mazda RX-7, Mitsubishi 3000GT, and Toyota Supra--are not exactly cheap, either.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category |
Nissan 300ZX Rating |
|
Performance |
8 |
|
Fuel Economy |
3 |
|
Ride Quality |
2 |
|
Steering/Handling/Braking |
8 |
|
Quietness |
2 |
|
Controls/Materials |
5 |
|
Interior Room |
4 |
|
Room/Comfort (rear) |
0 |
|
Cargo Capacity |
2 |
|
Value within Class |
4 |
| Total Score: |
38 |
|
Each vehicle report contains one rating chart for representative model. Consumer
Guide® rates in ten key areas: Performance, Fuel Economy, Ride Comfort, Steering
and Handling, Interior Noise, Controls and Materials, Driver Room, Passenger Room,
Cargo Capacity, and Insurance Costs. These ratings compare the particular vehicle
rated to ALL other vehicles, not a vehicle's standing in a particular class. In the
ratings table, "1" is the lowest rating and "10" is the highest rating.