1990-1996 Buick Regal: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Buick Regal
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Antilock brakes (optional until '94)
- Ride
- Acceleration (3.8-liter V6)
- Passenger and cargo room
Cons
- Seat comfort
- Engine noise (early models)
- Performance (early models)
- Fuel economy (3.8-liter V6)
- Instruments/controls (early models)
- Steering feel
Vehicle Highlights
Buick's version was the first of the new midsize front-drive coupes introduced for 1988 and soon followed by the Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme and Pontiac Grand Prix. Regals came in Custom and costlier Limited trim. A Gran Sport option group featured Buick's Gran Touring suspension and 16-inch tires. All-disc brakes were standard; antilock braking optional on upper models. No airbag was available, but like other GM cars, front seatbelts could be left buckled to deploy automatically.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Buick Regal Limited Sedan Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 6 | |
| Total Score: | 48 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1990-1996 Buick Regal includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1990-1996 Buick Regal and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1990-1996 Buick Regal is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
A Regal might not be much to get excited about, but it's not a bad choice when prices are tempting. About 75 percent of Regals got the 3.8-liter V6, and that's the one that approaches Ford Taurus in appeal.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Buick Regal Limited Sedan Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 5 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 6 | |
| Total Score: | 48 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $555 |
| Alternator | $215 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $1,075 |
| Brakes | $200 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $470 |
| Exhaust System | $470 |
| Radiator | $340 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $1,856 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $170 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1996 | |||
| Regal | $2,000-2,500 | $1,400-1,800 | $300-400 |
| 1995 | |||
| Regal | $1,700-2,200 | $1,100-1,500 | $300 |
| 1994 | |||
| Regal | $1,500-1,900 | $1,000-1,200 | $200 |
| 1993 | |||
| Regal | $1,300-1,700 | $800-1,100 | $200 |
| 1992 | |||
| Regal | $1,200-1,500 | $700-900 | $100-200 |
| 1991 | |||
| Regal | $1,100-1,400 | $700-900 | $100-200 |
| 1990 | |||
| Regal | $1,000-1,300 | $600-800 | $100 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 2-door coupe | 4-door sedan |
| Wheelbase, in. | 107.5 | 107.5 |
| Overall Length, in. | 193.9 | 193.7 |
| Overall Width, in. | 72.5 | 72.5 |
| Overall Height, in. | 53.0 | 54.5 |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3232 | 3335 |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 15.6 | 15.9 |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | -- |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 16.5 | 16.5 |
| Seating Capacity | 6 | 6 |
| Front Head Room, in. | 37.6 | 38.6 |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 42.3 | 42.4 |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 37.0 | 37.8 |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 34.8 | 36.2 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohv V6 | 3.8 / 231 | 170-205 | 220-230 | 4-speed automatic: 19/30 | 4-speed automatic: 17.3 |
| ohv V6 | 3.1 / 191 | 135-160 | 180-185 | 4-speed automatic: 20/29 | 4-speed automatic: 20.5 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1995 Regal |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 4 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 3 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








