1990-1995 Mercury Sable: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Mercury Sable
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Acceleration (3.8-liter V6)
- Passenger and cargo room
- Ride
- Antilock brakes (optional)
Cons
- Fuel economy
- Radio controls
- Instruments/controls (electronic)
Vehicle Highlights
The Mercury Sable shared virtually all mechanical components with its stablemate, the Ford Taurus. Standard power for both GS and LS trim levels came from a 3.0-liter V6 and 4-speed overdrive automatic. The optional 3.8-liter V6 delivered the same amount of horsepower (140), but instead of 160 pound-feet, put out 215 pound-feet of torque.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Mercury Sable 3.8-liter Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 4 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 48 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1990-1995 Mercury Sable includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1990-1995 Mercury Sable and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1990-1995 Mercury Sable is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
The Mercury Sable and Ford Taurus, the best-selling sedan in the country for over four years, have remained popular with the buying public because they continue to represent a good value when compared to other midsize cars. They're roomy, well-built, have competent road manners, and sell at reasonable prices. The quality of the Sable improved over the years, until the car was able to match or exceed the quality of its Japanese competitors.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Mercury Sable 3.8-liter Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 4 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 48 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $455 |
| Alternator | $415 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $940 |
| Brakes | $230 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $485 |
| Exhaust System | $430 |
| Radiator | $525 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $680 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1995 | |||
| Sable | $1,500-2,000 | $1,000-1,300 | $200-300 |
| 1994 | |||
| Sable | $1,300-1,800 | $800-1,100 | $200 |
| 1993 | |||
| Sable | $1,200-1,600 | $700-1,000 | $100-200 |
| 1992 | |||
| Sable | $1,100-1,500 | $700-900 | $100-200 |
| 1991 | |||
| Sable | $1,000-1,400 | $600-800 | $100 |
| 1990 | |||
| Sable | $1,000-1,300 | $600-800 | $100 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door sedan | 4-door wagon |
| Wheelbase, in. | 106.0 | 106.0 |
| Overall Length, in. | 192.2 | 193.3 |
| Overall Width, in. | 70.9 | 70.9 |
| Overall Height, in. | 54.1 | 55.5 |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3144 | 3292 |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 18.0 | 83.1 |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | -- |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 16.0 | 16.0 |
| Seating Capacity | 6 | 8 |
| Front Head Room, in. | 38.3 | 38.6 |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 41.7 | 41.7 |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 37.7 | 38.1 |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 37.1 | 36.9 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohv V6 | 3.0 / 182 | 140 | 165 | 4-speed automatic: 20/30 | 4-speed automatic: -- |
| ohv V6 | 3.8 / 232 | 140 | 215 | 4-speed automatic: 19/28 | 4-speed automatic: 16.8 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1995 Sable |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | -- |
| Front Impact, Passenger | -- |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








