1990-1995 Ford Taurus: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Ford Taurus
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Ride
- Passenger and cargo room
- Acceleration (V6)
- Handling/roadholding
- Antilock brakes (optional)
Cons
- Acceleration (4-cylinder)
- Fuel economy (V6)
- Radio controls
Vehicle Highlights
Launched to great fanfare for 1986, the Mercury Sable looks similar, but the midsize sedans shared no sheetmetal. Both mix contemporary design with a spacious interior. Starting in 1990, a driver-side airbag was standard on all Taurus models. A 4-cylinder engine continued to power the L and GL sedans, but wagons held a 3.0-liter V6. At LX level, sedans used the 3.0-liter V6, while the wagon benefited from a 3.8-liter V6.A high-performance SHO version, introduced for '89, carries a 220-horsepower twin cam V6 that was built in Japan from a Yamaha design, plus all-disc brakes and 5-speed manual shift. No automatic transmission was available, but antilock braking was added during the SHO's 1990 season. ABS was optional on other sedans.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Ford Taurus LX sedan 3.8-liter Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 4 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 48 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1990-1995 Ford Taurus includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1990-1995 Ford Taurus and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1990-1995 Ford Taurus is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
We rank the early '90s Taurus/Sable among the most impressive domestic cars: solid, roomy, great to look at, and a joy to drive.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Ford Taurus LX sedan 3.8-liter Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | |
| Fuel Economy | 4 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 5 | |
| Controls/Materials | 5 | |
| Interior Room | 6 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 48 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $455 |
| Alternator | $440 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $930 |
| Brakes | $230 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $505 |
| Exhaust System | $365 |
| Radiator | $525 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $495 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $210 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1995 | |||
| Taurus | $1,500-1,900 | $1,000-1,200 | $200 |
| Taurus SHO | $2,100-2,600 | $1,500-1,800 | $400 |
| 1994 | |||
| Taurus | $1,300-1,700 | $800-1,100 | $200 |
| Taurus SHO | $1,900-2,400 | $1,300-1,700 | $300-400 |
| 1993 | |||
| Taurus | $1,200-1,600 | $700-1,000 | $100-200 |
| Taurus SHO | $1,800-2,300 | $1,200-1,600 | $300 |
| 1992 | |||
| Taurus | $1,100-1,500 | $700-900 | $100-200 |
| Taurus SHO | $1,700-2,100 | $1,100-1,400 | $300 |
| 1991 | |||
| Taurus | $1,000-1,400 | $600-800 | $100 |
| Taurus SHO | $1,500-1,900 | $1,000-1,200 | $200 |
| 1990 | |||
| Taurus | $1,000-1,300 | $600-800 | $100 |
| Taurus SHO | $1,300-1,600 | $800-1,000 | $200 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door sedan | 4-door wagon |
| Wheelbase, in. | 106.0 | 106.0 |
| Overall Length, in. | 192.0 | 193.1 |
| Overall Width, in. | 70.7 | 70.7 |
| Overall Height, in. | 54.1 | 55.5 |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3118 | 3285 |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 18.0 | 83.1 |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | -- |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 16.0 | 16.0 |
| Seating Capacity | 6 | 8 |
| Front Head Room, in. | 38.3 | 38.5 |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 41.7 | 41.7 |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 37.6 | 38.1 |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 37.7 | 36.9 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohv I4 | 2.5 / 153 | 90-105 | 130-140 | 3-speed automatic: 21/27 | 3-speed automatic: -- |
| ohv V6 | 3.0 / 182 | 140 | 160-165 | 4-speed automatic: 20/30 | 4-speed automatic: -- |
| dohc V6 | 3.0 / 182 | 220 | 200 | 5-speed manual: 18/26 | 5-speed manual: -- |
| dohc V6 | 3.2 / 195 | 220 | 215 | 4-speed automatic: 18/26 | 4-speed automatic: -- |
| ohv V6 | 3.8 / 232 | 140 | 215 | 4-speed automatic: 19/28 | 4-speed automatic: 17.9 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1995 Taurus |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | -- |
| Front Impact, Passenger | -- |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








