1990-1994 Suzuki Swift: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Suzuki Swift
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Fuel economy
- Handling/roadholding (GT)
- Acceleration (GT)
Cons
- Noise
- Passenger room
Vehicle Highlights
Introduced for 1989, the Swift came in 2-door hatchback and 4-door notchback form. Riding a longer wheelbase than the 2-door, the 4-door model came in GA, GL, and GS trim, with a 70 horsepower, 1.3-liter 4-cylinder engine. The GA edition came only with 5-speed manual shift, while other Swifts had a choice of the 5-speed or 3-speed automatic transmission. Two-door hatchbacks came three ways, too: entry-level GA, midlevel GL, and sporty GT. Equipped with a dual-overhead-cam 1.3-liter engine, the GT included a close-ratio 5-speed manual gearbox, 4-wheel disc brakes, sport seats, sport suspension, and 175/60R14 tires. Swift was also marketed under the Geo brand as the Metro.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Suzuki Swift GT Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 2 | |
| Fuel Economy | 7 | |
| Ride Quality | 2 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 2 | |
| Quietness | 1 | |
| Controls/Materials | 3 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 2 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 2 | |
| Value within Class | 2 | |
| Total Score: | 27 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1990-1994 Suzuki Swift includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1990-1994 Suzuki Swift and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1990-1994 Suzuki Swift is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
For the most part, Swifts have reminded us of Japanese subcompacts from the mid-1980s: noisy, cramped, basic--but stingy with fuel. As economical runabouts, they'll do--but just barely.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Suzuki Swift GT Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 2 | |
| Fuel Economy | 7 | |
| Ride Quality | 2 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 2 | |
| Quietness | 1 | |
| Controls/Materials | 3 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 2 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 2 | |
| Value within Class | 2 | |
| Total Score: | 27 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $540 |
| Alternator | $400 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $770 |
| Brakes | $200 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $410 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $700 |
| Exhaust System | $145 |
| Radiator | $335 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $660 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $190 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1994 | |||
| Swift | $1,100-1,400 | $700-900 | $100-200 |
| 1993 | |||
| Swift | $1,000-1,300 | $600-800 | $100 |
| 1992 | |||
| Swift | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 1991 | |||
| Swift | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 1990 | |||
| Swift | $0 | $0 | $0 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 2-door hatchback | 4-door sedan |
| Wheelbase, in. | 89.2 | 93.1 |
| Overall Length, in. | 147.4 | 161.2 |
| Overall Width, in. | 62.6 | 62.6 |
| Overall Height, in. | 52.4 | 53.5 |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 1781 | 1894 |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 10.3 | 11.5 |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | -- |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Seating Capacity | 4 | 4 |
| Front Head Room, in. | 37.8 | 39.1 |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 42.5 | 42.5 |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 36.5 | 37.7 |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 29.8 | 32.0 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohc I4 | 1.3 / 79 | 70 | 74 | 5-speed manual: 37/43 3-speed automatic: 29/34 |
5-speed manual: 35.8 3-speed automatic: -- |
| dohc I4 | 1.3 / 97 | 100 | 83 | 5-speed manual: 28/35 | 5-speed manual: 21.4 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1994 Swift |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 3 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 4 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








