1990-1994 Ford Tempo: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Ford Tempo
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Wet-weather traction (AWD sedan)
- Acceleration (V6)
Cons
- Automatic-transmission performance
- Acceleration (4-cylinder)
- Handling/roadholding
- No antilock brakes
- Engine noise (4-cylinder)
Vehicle Highlights
Introduced for 1984, Tempo and the similar Mercury Topaz were facelifted in 1988. The front-drive 2- and 4-door sedans came in two trim levels for 1990: GL and GLS. A top-of-the-line LX edition came only as a 4-door. A driver-side airbag had been optional on 4-doors as early as 1986, though not many were installed. A part-time 4-wheel-drive option debuted in 1987, intended for use only on slippery pavement. This All-Wheel Drive system came only on 4-door sedans. A 98-horsepower 4-cylinder engine went into GL and LX models, while GLS and All-Wheel Drive Tempos got a 100-horsepower rendition.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Ford Tempo LS 3.0-liter Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 3 | |
| Fuel Economy | 6 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 3 | |
| Quietness | 4 | |
| Controls/Materials | 3 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 4 | |
| Total Score: | 39 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1990-1994 Ford Tempo includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1990-1994 Ford Tempo and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1990-1994 Ford Tempo is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
Though no match for Japanese rivals, you still get a lot of car for a very modest number of dollars. If it's basic transportation that you're seeking, Tempos are still worth a quick look.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Ford Tempo LS 3.0-liter Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 3 | |
| Fuel Economy | 6 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 3 | |
| Quietness | 4 | |
| Controls/Materials | 3 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 4 | |
| Total Score: | 39 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $450 |
| Alternator | $420 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $780 |
| Brakes | $210 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $445 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $425 |
| Exhaust System | $215 |
| Radiator | $430 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $535 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $235 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1994 | |||
| Tempo | $1,200-1,600 | $700-1,000 | $100-200 |
| 1993 | |||
| Tempo | $1,100-1,400 | $700-900 | $100-200 |
| 1992 | |||
| Tempo | $1,000-1,300 | $600-800 | $100 |
| 1991 | |||
| Tempo | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 1990 | |||
| Tempo | $0 | $0 | $0 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 2-door coupe | 4-door sedan |
| Wheelbase, in. | 99.9 | 99.9 |
| Overall Length, in. | 176.7 | 177.0 |
| Overall Width, in. | 68.3 | 68.3 |
| Overall Height, in. | 52.8 | 52.9 |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 2511 | 2569 |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 13.2 | 12.9 |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | -- |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 15.9 | 15.9 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Front Head Room, in. | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 41.5 | 41.5 |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 36.8 | 36.9 |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 36.0 | 36.0 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohv I4 | 2.3 / 141 | 96-98 | 124-126 | 5-speed manual: 24/33 3-speed automatic: 22/27 |
5-speed manual: 22.6 3-speed automatic: 19.8 |
| ohv V6 | 3.0 / 182 | 135 | 150 | 5-speed manual: 21/28 3-speed automatic: 20/23 |
5-speed manual: -- 3-speed automatic: 19.2 |
| ohv I4 | 2.3 / 141 | 100 | 130 | 5-speed manual: 21/29 3-speed automatic: 22/26 |
5-speed manual: -- 3-speed automatic: -- |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1994 Tempo |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 4 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 4 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








