1990-1993 Ford Mustang: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Ford Mustang
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Acceleration (V8 models)
- Handling/roadholding
Cons
- Fuel economy (V8)
- Ride
- Acceleration (4-cylinder)
- Noise
- Rear-seat room
Vehicle Highlights
By 1990, this generation of Ford's popular rear-drive ponycar was more than a decade old, having been introduced for 1979. Mustangs came in coupe and convertible form, accompanied by a 2-door hatchback coupe. All three body styles were available in LX trim with a standard 2.3-liter 4-cylinder engine or optional V8 (dubbed LX 5.0L). The high-performance GT was limited to hatchback and convertible bodies and included the V8 engine. A driver-side airbag arrived for 1990, along with rear shoulder belts.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Ford Mustang GT Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 7 | |
| Fuel Economy | 2 | |
| Ride Quality | 2 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 7 | |
| Quietness | 2 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 39 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1990-1993 Ford Mustang includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1990-1993 Ford Mustang and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1990-1993 Ford Mustang is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
To be frank, few other cars offer as much bang for the buck as a Mustang. Only the Chevrolet Camaro and Pontiac Firebird rank as true rivals. Despite high insurance rates and poor gas mileage, Mustangs still deliver good overall value, new or used.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Ford Mustang GT Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 7 | |
| Fuel Economy | 2 | |
| Ride Quality | 2 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 7 | |
| Quietness | 2 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 3 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 3 | |
| Value within Class | 5 | |
| Total Score: | 39 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $410 |
| Alternator | $535 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $675 |
| Brakes | $245 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $480 |
| Exhaust System | $565 |
| Radiator | $360 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $435 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $215 |
| Universal Joints | $95 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1993 | |||
| GT Convertible | $3,400-4,100 | $2,700-3,200 | $900-1,100 |
| LX Convertible | $2,100-3,000 | $1,500-2,100 | $400-500 |
| Mustang GT | $2,700-3,400 | $2,000-2,600 | $600-700 |
| Mustang LX | $1,400-2,300 | $900-1,500 | $200-300 |
| 1992 | |||
| GT Convertible | $3,000-3,600 | $2,300-2,800 | $700-800 |
| LX Convertible | $1,900-2,600 | $1,300-1,800 | $300-400 |
| Mustang GT | $2,400-3,000 | $1,700-2,200 | $500-600 |
| Mustang LX | $1,200-1,900 | $700-1,200 | $100-200 |
| 1991 | |||
| GT Convertible | $2,600-3,200 | $1,900-2,400 | $500-700 |
| LX Convertible | $1,600-2,200 | $1,100-1,500 | $200-300 |
| Mustang GT | $2,000-2,600 | $1,400-1,800 | $300-400 |
| Mustang LX | $1,100-1,700 | $700-1,000 | $100-200 |
| 1990 | |||
| GT Convertible | $2,300-2,800 | $1,700-2,000 | $400-500 |
| LX Convertible | $1,400-1,800 | $900-1,200 | $200 |
| Mustang GT | $1,700-2,300 | $1,100-1,500 | $300 |
| Mustang LX | $1,000-1,500 | $600-900 | $100-200 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 2-door convertible | 2-door coupe | 2-door hatchback |
| Wheelbase, in. | 100.5 | 100.5 | 100.5 |
| Overall Length, in. | 179.6 | 179.6 | 179.6 |
| Overall Width, in. | 68.3 | 68.3 | 68.3 |
| Overall Height, in. | 52.1 | 52.1 | 52.1 |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 2996 | 2775 | 2834 |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 6.4 | 10.0 | 30.0 |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | -- | -- |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 15.4 | 15.4 | 15.4 |
| Seating Capacity | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Front Head Room, in. | 37.6 | 37.0 | 37.0 |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 41.7 | 41.7 | 41.7 |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 37.0 | 35.9 | 35.7 |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 30.7 | 30.7 | 30.7 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohc I4 | 2.3 / 140 | 88 | 132 | 5-speed manual: 23/29 | 5-speed manual: -- |
| ohv V8 | 5.0 / 302 | 205-225 | 275-300 | 5-speed manual: 17/24 4-speed automatic: 17/24 |
5-speed manual: 15.3 4-speed automatic: -- |
| ohv V8 | 5.0 / 302 | 245 | 320 | 5-speed manual: -- | 5-speed manual: -- |
| ohc I4 | 2.3 / 140 | 105 | 135 | 5-speed manual: 22/30 4-speed automatic: 22/29 |
5-speed manual: -- 4-speed automatic: 19.8 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
| Test | 1993 Mustang |
|---|---|
| Front Impact, Driver | 4 |
| Front Impact, Passenger | 4 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








